Comcast Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,935
Points 1,118,545
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Thu, Sep 4 2008 4:07 PM

You didn't seriously think Comcast would roll over without a fight, did you? It was only a matter of time after FCC's decision in early August, before Comcast took some legal action. And here we are.



Last month, the FCC voted 3-2 to declare that Comcast's throttling of BitTorrent P2P traffic last year was illegal. At that time the FCC ordered Comcast to not just stop blocking P2P traffic, but also to provide more details of its network management policies within 30 days.



According to the Wall Street Journal (paid subscription required), Comcast on Thursday filed suit to overturn the ruling. At the same time, despite this, Comcast indicated it will continue to abide by the earlier FCC order, including the policy information mentioned above.

Comcast executive vice president David L. Cohen said (in a written statement):
"We filed this appeal in order to protect our legal rights and to challenge the basis on which the [FCC] found that Comcast violated federal policy in the absence of pre-existing legally enforceable standards or rules Although the company recognizes the FCC's jurisdiction over Internet service providers, Comcast believes in this case the FCC's action 'was legally inappropriate and its findings were not justified by the record.'"
Besides the obvious "huh?," what does all this mean? Well, it seems that earlier Comcast had argued that the FCC has authority to bring enforcement actions under rules, not principles. The above language is stating that "net neutrality" is not a pre-existing rule, but instead a principle, and thus, unenforceable by the FCC.



Why bother, if Comcast is going to abide by the decision? The ruling sets a dangerous (to ISPs) precedent, and that what they wiped from the books.



The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C.



  • | Post Points: 65
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,218
Points 18,720
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: United States, Texas
warlord replied on Thu, Sep 4 2008 6:16 PM

We haven't even come close to hearing an end to this 1

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,250
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: U.S.
mazuki replied on Thu, Sep 4 2008 7:38 PM

tbh the throttling wasn't that bad, i say bring it back and remove the 250gb cap ;)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,048
Points 60,675
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Thu, Sep 4 2008 8:51 PM

Maybe next, for the benefit of the majority of their customers, Comcast will restrict your internet access to port 80! Then, they can restrict you to only access web sites that don't use a lot of bandwidth! Then, they can filter out all those img tags on incoming web pages to make your internet experience even faster!

Wow, it must be great to be a Comcast customer and have them looking out for you like that!

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,419
Points 46,595
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator

Comcast can kiss my big hairy Super Butt.

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,181
Points 90,135
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

mazuki:

tbh the throttling wasn't that bad, i say bring it back and remove the 250gb cap ;)

It took me overnight to download a ubuntu cd and was the reason I switched to Verizon.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS