Will Windows Die If It Can’t Change?

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,480
Points 1,196,225
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sat, Apr 12 2008 5:27 PM

The end may be neigh for Windows as we know it if according to research firm Gartner:

"Because Microsoft Windows is so large and complex, covering 20 years of legacy code, it can no longer adequately respond to market forces, and Windows needs to be securely redesigned, said Gartner analysts Michael Silver and Neil MacDonald. They delivered the news at the Gartner Symposium/ITxpo 2008 in Las Vegas this week."

We’re not entirely sure that this is the case just yet, but we could certainly see the argument for this happening eventually.  So the question then would be, what will have to happen?

Will MS eventually write a whole new version of Windows and include some legacy support via emulation, much the same way OS X initially supported legacy apps?  Would a completely fresh start work better, one with no backwards compatibility?

These are all interesting questions, and virtually impossible to answer with any certainty.



  • | Post Points: 65
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,617
Points 32,625
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota, United States
ice91785 replied on Sun, Apr 13 2008 9:21 AM
I haven't heard this yet -- quite a noodle scratcher yes? Either way because of all the users that are brought up around PCs you can guarantee there would be a huge outcry from PC users everywhere should something of the aforementioned should occur -- ESPECIALLY the lack of legacy support (although emulation would be somewhat tolerable)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 235
Points 3,045
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: newark nj
higgamo replied on Sun, Apr 13 2008 11:29 AM

maybe in the future they can make two ms that one that that basic around legacy and one the take a new directions. never know change can be good

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 7
Points 95
Joined: Apr 2008
Exilon replied on Sun, Apr 13 2008 12:57 PM
Windows 7 is supposed to do away with the legacy code by implementing a VM for backwards compatibility.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,250
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: U.S.
mazuki replied on Mon, Apr 14 2008 10:42 PM
i think a whole new design from ground up would do good, even though the kernel is supposedly nice.

look what it did for intel for goodnessake.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,617
Points 32,625
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota, United States
ice91785 replied on Mon, Apr 14 2008 10:54 PM

mazuki:
whole new design from ground up would do good
 

Vista was pretty much just this -- I do not think it did "much good" 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Mac has been using OSX for some time now and they will continue for long time too.  So there are advantages to using the same kernal/architecture.  I'm for new designs every decade or so, but if Vista is the answer I'm afraid I don't like what MS is trying to do.  Hopefully Windows 7 is a fresh, good start.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS