i wonder what there timings are
2GB? Pssshh...thats child's play at this point! Impressive speeds thought but as frg1 said -- I wonder if we are dealing with like 9-9-9-22 timings here to achieve such a frequency
they didnt say so figure its gonna be pretty high because if they got it low enough they would of annocened that to
Your intuition is correct ice, they do have relatively poor latency. The timings are as follows:
***WARNING the above links are PDF's***
***** Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. *****
thats the reason i prefer ddr2 over ddr3 that and they cost less
GAH! why didn't you warn me they were .pdf's? Lol
Thanks for the info none-the-less......Interesting how the 2Ghz model have lower timings than does the 1.6Ghz flavor....However I am sure when DDR3 becomes mainstream the timings will follow suit but I don't think its feasible to expect less than CAS-5 (thats pushing it even).
I know that ddr2 also put much less pressure on CAS and shifted a lot of it to TRAS (in terms of latency) -- does anyone happen to know if ddr3 again shifted gears ?
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms