Net Pioneers Slam Comcast

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,383
Points 1,192,305
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Tue, Feb 26 2008 12:10 PM

You've probably heard that Comcast is throttling P2P downloads, and that the FCC was interested enough to hold a hearing yesterday.  At that hearing, 2 Internet pioneers gave Comcast a piece of their minds.

David Reed, an MIT professor who's considered to be an Internet engineering pioneer, said Comcast's behavior makes him especially "uncomfortable" because it involves both deep packet inspection, which poses privacy concerns, and injection of forged reset packets, a disruptive tactic that makes a message appear to be coming from someone it's not.

One problem is an absence of quantifiable ways of figuring out whether peer-to-peer use is causing consumers to exceed their seemingly unspoken bandwidth allotments--and what those are, anyway. FCC Republican Chairman Kevin Martin and Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell each pressed Comcast to help supply that information, but in a way, they may have been asking the wrong question.

That ambiguous threshold makes it difficult for application developers and users alike to know what exactly they're getting from their Internet access provider, David Clark, chief protocol architect of the Internet during its nascent stages and a senior research scientist at MIT.

Clark said he doesn't understand why ISPs are reluctant to be more specific about such policies, although he did acknowledge it's difficult to say "how much is too much." "If I had to quantify what constituted unacceptable congestion, it becomes a very contentious space," he said. 

It would be nice to see the FCC continue to pursue this matter.  Actually, it would be more than nice, but with the FCC, who knows?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 795
Points 13,650
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Reseda
Kamrooz replied on Tue, Feb 26 2008 7:29 PM

I really do not like where comcast is going with this. Same with other fiber optic providers with limited bandwidth and overage charges. We need to be heading for faster internet to ease up that congestion, not limit people and deal with what we got when japan has speds 5x faster than our fastest cable provider. ::sighs:: It's damn annoying america's stand on making profit...literally want to make as much money as possible on as little as possible...Not much innovation and pushing the envelope of technology will get done with that mindset. 

2x Core 2 Quad QX9775 2Gb DDR2-667 Kingston FBDimm 150GB Western Digital Raptor 2x 500 Gb Seagate 7200.10 2x 8800 GT SLI Intel D5400XS (Skulltrail) Gigabyte 3D Aurora 570 Ultra X3 1KW psu 2X Liteon DL DVD-RW Rig courtesy of HotHardware! =D
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,250
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: U.S.
mazuki replied on Tue, Feb 26 2008 8:23 PM
not only is their view on profits bad, but they would rather make the quick dollar right away, then to get a lasting customer base that will benefit them during any hard times to come.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS