All due to the LCD technology. Way too many faults if you ask me. It will definitely change when FED and OLED becomes available and affordable. But personally, I'm skipping the LCD generation. High end CRT's demolish these LCD's. The production company that created the film "300", Pixar, and Lucasarts can't be wrong in picking up Sony FW900 monitors. Even though CRT's are big, bulky, and heavy....They offer unrivaled color accuracy/quality/detail.
OLED and FED will truly be a dream though ^_^. Time is all we have to wait for.
You know older sets lacked enough HD inputs. One of my neighbors has a set which is a 42" 720p Toshiba LCD model about 2-3 years old and it has 0 HDMI, 1 DVI and 2 component connections. He's got the component going from the DVD player and the cable box and the DVI port on this set doesn't work with a DVI to HDMI adapter, or a HDMI to DVI cable for some reason. Its a beautiful set but the lack of inputs is forcing an upgrade this summer.
Another thing which sucks is the cable/satellite providers deliver HD content that is highly compressed with lots of artifacts, the only really clean HD television I see if from over the air sources, thank god i live in a big city and can get good free OTA sources for all the major TV networks.
I agree that 1 of the biggest problems is the salesman not educating the consumer. Of course if the consumer don't take the time to figure out what they're buying than it's just as much they're fault too. Speaking of refresh rates, my parents were sold 1 of the best LCD's I have ever seen. It's from Samsung and boasts a whopping 120hz. The best picture I have seen by far yet. It actually looks like your watching a 3d movie almost. they got the 40" version for about 2,000 from sears.
Has there been any more word on SED technology. I read an article on it ahile back in PC magazine but have heard nothing since then. Not that there is anyting wrong with LCD technology. It has come a long way. But of course if a unknowing customer goes into a store and buys a set that is a couple generations old, than yeah your gonna find much to be improved. One of the biggest letdowns people see imo is they don't realize what they're SD picture is gonna look like when displayed on a much larger screen. Obviously the bigger the screen the easier to notice imperfections.
Another thing to note is just like building a computer should be taylored to the needs of that user, an HDTV should be taylored for the room it's being viewed in. They're are 4 types of technologies available and each 1 has it's pro's and con's.
Nelson: Regarding SED, unfortunately it is now dead. It died off a year or two ago when it ran into legal issues with nanotechnology. BUT, don't fret, FED from sony is VERY similar offering the same benefits. Basically, it's a CRT in a flat panel form. It offers all the benefits of a CRT, with all the benefits of a LCD. Higher gamut displays, pure blacks, no input lags or response time issues or any of that. It's also capable of a whopping 240hz...Which will make movies look very lifelike. They also offer one factor which is just fantastic, it won't show a single dead pixel even if 20% of the field emitters fail. Talk about comforting, no more dead pixels. Here's a video on it.
Truly fantastic stuff =D. The quality of CRT's improved upon in a flat panel form.
Here's a video based on OLED.
Expect these to become available and affordable in about 2 years or so, late 2010 or early 2011. =(...I know...the wait is a killer.
that's pretty cool. thanks for the heads up. So even if they release it in say 2 years I wouldn't buy 1 for atleast 4 though. With HDTV tech history, they tend to be way overpriced on first release and have a few bugs to be worked out. Remeber the burn in's for plasma's and the ghosting for lcd's. I am sure there will be something they will have to work out with the 2nd or 3rd genereation of this tech.
The timeline I stated is with that involved. Expect to see OLED surface late into 2009 in more availabily and sizes hopefully. Or early 2010...Late 2010 prices should drop a decent amount, and into 2011 even more. I agree though, I don't like to adopt early...I feel sorry and somewhat laugh at those who picked up the first HDTV sets that were capable of 480p only. Adopting way too early in certain technologies is really not the way to go. Unless you spend water like money and have a lot of it. =P
But yea, 2nd generation and 3rd would be the best route imo...But it'll be quite a ways away.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms