Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 750GB Hard Drive

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 110
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: United States, Massachusetts
YourSiteRules Posted: Sun, Jun 24 2007 8:33 AM
Quoting from http://www.hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=827

quote:

The jumper placement determines whether the drive operates at 1.5 Gb/s or 3.0 Gb/s. If you have an older motherboard that does not include support for SATA 3.0 Gb/s (often mistakenly referred to as SATA II)


Post Edited. I'm a moron with nothing better to do than run off at the mouth when I don't actually have a clue.
  • | Post Points: 110
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,063
Points 46,755
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: United Kingdom, Other
Elsparrow replied on Sun, Jun 24 2007 9:45 AM
Actually SATA II is incorrect, it's SATA 3.0Gb/s, SATA II is not actually a new standard in SATA interfaces.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,747
Points 42,815
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: United States, California
Be it right or wrong that post was an absolute waste moron and HH rules!!! You're the one that sucks.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,413
Points 46,555
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
quote:

Originally posted by: YourSiteSucks
Quoting from http://www.hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=827

quote:

The jumper placement determines whether the drive operates at 1.5 Gb/s or 3.0 Gb/s. If you have an older motherboard that does not include support for SATA 3.0 Gb/s (often mistakenly referred to as SATA II)


If you guys had a fu.cking brain you'd realise that SATA 3.0 Gb/s is known quite predominantly as SATA II.

Kill yourselves.


WOW. HAVE YOU BEEN DRINKING THAT CHEAP BEER AGAIN?

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 162
Points 2,540
Joined: Aug 2001
Location: United States, North Carolina
JeffB replied on Sun, Jun 24 2007 1:58 PM
Perhaps if you did a little more research before attacking the credit of our site, you would have come to the realization that you are the one with the wrong idea. Next time let Google teach you a thing or two before opening your mouth. You'll be less apt to end up with mud on your face.

http://www.sata-io.org/namingguidelines.asp

I hope this makes it a little clearer for you Recruit. I chose a link that comes with a grid that breaks it down in the simplest of terms for you.

"The first step toward a better understanding of SATA is to know that SATA II is not the brand name for SATAs 3Gb/s data transfer rate, but the name of the organization formed to author the SATA specifications. The group has since changed names, to the Serial ATA International Organization, or SATA-IO.

The 3Gb/s capability is just one of many defined by the former SATA II committee, but because it is among the most prominent features, 3Gb/s has become synonymous with SATA II. Hence, the source of the confusion."

Also, note the very last line on the page:

"Important. Do not use SATA II to represent 3Gb/s"

That sums it up. Over and out.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,746
Points 24,320
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: United States, Louisiana
Uhh..lets get an IP block on this OBVIOUS moron....mmmmk.....thanks so much

Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 / Intel Core2Duo 6420 / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 800MHz / WD 36GB Raptor (OS) / Seagate 80GB SATA (Games) / 2xWD 250GB SATA RAID1 (Downloads) / Maxtor 160GB SATA (Temporary space for DVD burning) / XFX 7800GT w/ AcceleroX1 / Lite-On 16x DL DVD +/- RW / Ultra X-Connect 500W UV PSU / Logitech MX510 / Windows XP Home / 22" WS Westinghouse LCD Monitor @ 1680x1050

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,017
Points 43,210
Joined: May 2005
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator
nelsoncp21 replied on Sun, Jun 24 2007 11:05 PM
OMG it sounds like someone has't gotten laid in awhile. chill out. geez if you wanted to try to point something out that you thought was legit than there is a much more civilized way to go about it instead of ranting like a moron who is mad at the world cause he can't get no punanny.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,341
Points 48,460
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Mon, Jun 25 2007 12:07 AM
Looks like someone edited his username and original post...wonder who that could have been.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,017
Points 43,210
Joined: May 2005
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator
nelsoncp21 replied on Thu, Jun 28 2007 10:14 PM

that is to funny. Do you feel like Heman. " I have the power" This is why I could never be an admin I would commpletley abuse any power given to me. That guy def deserved it though

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,413
Points 46,555
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
Super Dave replied on Thu, Jun 28 2007 11:07 PM

Kinda likeLightning? Hey, these smileys are pretty cool! But yeah, that guy definitely did a drive-by on our forum. Funny thing, some people get really BOLD when they can post anonymously. Maybe he was drinking that cheap beer...

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,617
Points 32,625
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota, United States
ice91785 replied on Fri, Jun 29 2007 1:32 PM

...............Hotshot?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS