<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Apple Handheld Devices</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/62.aspx</link><description>iPods, iPhones - mobility, you get the idea</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RE: Apple Tries to Silence Low Cost iPhone Chatter</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444989.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:54:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:444989</guid><dc:creator>Dorkstar</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444989.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=62&amp;PostID=444989</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know. &amp;nbsp;While it would probably &amp;quot;cheapen&amp;quot; the value of their name, surely it would make gains in a market they once were unable or unwilling to enter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Apple Tries to Silence Low Cost iPhone Chatter</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444973.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:26:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:444973</guid><dc:creator>Paul_Lilly</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444973.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=62&amp;PostID=444973</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll give them credit for releasing a lower cost iPad (iPad mini), but you&amp;#39;re right, it&amp;#39;s now really &amp;quot;low cost&amp;quot; at $329.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Apple Tries to Silence Low Cost iPhone Chatter</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444972.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:08:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:444972</guid><dc:creator>MCaddick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444972.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=62&amp;PostID=444972</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple will never make low cost items. Low value yes, but not low cost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Tries to Silence Low Cost iPhone Chatter</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444957.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:444957</guid><dc:creator>News</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/444957.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=62&amp;PostID=444957</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;div class="newsText" id="dvPreComment"&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://hothardware.com/newsimages/Item24070/iPhone_Thumbnail.jpg" style="float: right;" /&gt;Trying to predict what &lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/Tags/apple.aspx"&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt; will do next is a little like playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey. If you get lucky, you&amp;#39;re spot with your prediction, and the odds go up exponentially if you receive some guidance. So, when &lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Apple-May-Build-Low-Cost-iPhone-to-Compete-with-Android/"&gt;rumors surfaced&lt;/a&gt; from seemingly reliable sources that Apple was building a low cost &lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/Tags/iphone.aspx"&gt;iPhone&lt;/a&gt; model to compete with &lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/Tags/android.aspx"&gt;Android&lt;/a&gt;, there were plenty of reasons to believe it was true. Hold the boat, says Apple.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In an interview with Chinese language &lt;em&gt;Shanghai Evening News&lt;/em&gt;, Apple senior VP of worldwide marketing Phil Schiller cast a wet blanket over dreams of owning a lower-end and inexpensive iPhone device, &lt;em&gt;Information Week&lt;/em&gt; reports. Schiller stated that lower cost iPhones would "never be the future of Apple products."&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/newsimages/Item24070/iPhone_5.jpg" alt="Apple iPhone 5" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt; One of the rumors originated from &lt;em&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt;, which claims to have received its information from "people briefed on the matter." As it was told, the new iPhone device would use a "different, less expensive body," perhaps constructed of polycarbonate plastic rather than aluminum. Internal hardware would likely be built around previous generation iPhone devices, much in the same way the iPad mini is essentially a smaller version of the iPad 2.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Schiller&amp;#39;s comments don&amp;#39;t completely extinguish the red hot rumors, however, as he could simply be stating that low cost iPhones won&amp;#39;t replace standard iPhone models. It just depends on how you interpret his remarks.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="newsTextBody" id="dvBody"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="newsText" id="dvComment"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>