<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General HotHardware Tech News</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/43.aspx</link><description>The place where you'll find daily HotHardware News stories for discussion, that don't relate to a specific HH Forum category.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298860.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:32:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298860</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298860.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298860</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of 2 core support(threads) in lots of apps,but that&amp;#39;s it!No more.Only some selected apps have quad support,and those are very little in number&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298835.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:59:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298835</guid><dc:creator>wolf2009</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298835.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298835</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/cs/Themes/hawaii/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;CoolZone:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Multicore programming is very hard,trust me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thats dissapointing to know , guess we wont see multi core applications anytime soon.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Multiprocessing</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298774.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:55:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298774</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298774.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298774</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;it does not really matter if windows supports multi-core,it matters only if the running application supports multi-threading or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Multiprocessing</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298585.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:50:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298585</guid><dc:creator>trueg50</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298585.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298585</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;While yes, Windows will use multiple processors very well, the issue is still, multi-processor use in single apps, such as Auto CADD, or games. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Multiprocessing</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298584.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298584</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298584.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298584</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;dont see why windows&amp;nbsp; wouldnt incorparate that in windows 7&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multiprocessing</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298582.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:42:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298582</guid><dc:creator>AjayD</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298582.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298582</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect we won&amp;#39;t see much support for multi-core processing among simpler applications until they become complex enough to truly benefit from it. The largest advantage will come via improved multi-core task assignment and processing in windows. Even if the application itself isn&amp;#39;t designed to take advantage of multiple cores, if you are multitasking, Windows will be better equipped to distribute tasks among the cores for maximum efficiency. Of course this will only apply to future processors that are designed for fully independent core functionality. Hopefully we will see the fruits of this research in Windows 7. It would be best if windows had the capability to automatically apply multiprocessing to all applications rather than requiring the individual applications to be programed as such.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; 

I don&amp;#39;t know very much about programming so please feel free to correct or enlighten me if I am wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298550.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:20:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298550</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298550.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298550</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It will be always be hard,and with the growth of threads,it gets harder and harder&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298478.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298478</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298478.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298478</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/cs/Themes/hawaii/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;CoolZone:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Multicore programming is very hard,trust me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; i know its hard im just saying make it easier with a new langauge or tools infact it will probably always be hard &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298454.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:30:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298454</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298454.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298454</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Multicore programming is very hard,trust me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298377.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:36:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298377</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298377.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298377</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;maybe if they had a new proggraming language this would make it easier&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298376.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298376</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298376.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298376</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;if microsoft will support with its Windows well multicore,you still have to convince all the programmers that make a lot of useful programs that you use day by day to make their apps with multicore support and that is hard,trust me,and no one will do that,at least just for now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298284.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:55:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298284</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298284.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298284</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds great&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298237.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:55:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298237</guid><dc:creator>trueg50</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298237.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298237</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Yes!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is excellant news, it means the multi-core beasts Intel is preparing will at the very least have some use in an Operating system, though Microsoft might pass on some of that knowledge to others via custom compilers / tools for developers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess this also means that the tools that Intel created for making multithreaded apps didn&amp;#39;t turn out so well. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298207.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:25:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298207</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298207.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298207</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;and this technology is headed where?Servers or workstations?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intel &amp; Microsoft Fund Multi-Threading Research</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298130.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:03:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298130</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298130.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=298130</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds intersting&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>