Intel Processors

Intel Unveils Nehalem-EX Octal-Core Server CPU

News — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:41:13 GMT

Intel just held a press conference in which the company spoke about its next-generation server processor currently dubbed Nehalem-EX. As its name suggests, the Nehalem-EX is based on the Nehalem microarchitecture which debuted with the Xeon 5500 and Core i7 series processors. The Nehalem-EX series, however, will be decidedly more high-end in terms of specifications and performance. Whereas current Xeon 5500 series processors feature four execution cores per CPU with support for up to eight threads through the use of Hyper-Threading, the Nehalem-EX series will be outfitted with up to eight execution cores per chip with support for up to sixteen threads, and 24MB of cache. In addition, the Nehalem-EX series will also sport some features carried over from the Itanium line, like Machine Check Architecture (MCA) Recovery.

Intel Nehalem-EX Microarchitecture - Image courtesy: Intel Corp.

According to Intel, the Nehalem-EX will offer up to nine times the memory bandwidth of the previous-generation Intel Xeon 7400 platform with up to double the memory capacity through the use of 16 memory slots per processor socket. The processors will also offer four high-bandwidth QuickPath Interconnect links per CPU to provide significant scalability, from large-memory two-socket systems through eight-socket systems capable of processing 128 threads simultaneously.

We've got a demo of the Nehalem-EX in action processing 128 threads right here.

[view:http://www.youtube.com/v/BQ4shSQJTd0]

In the video, Intel's Kennedy Brown and IBM's Kevin Powell show off an 8 socket, 64 core, 128 thread IBM server based on Intel's Nehalem-EX processor churning though a workload that pegs all cores at 100% utilization.

8-Socket Nehalem-EX Platform Architecture - 64 Cores, 128-Threads, Scalable to 32-Socket

Nehalem-EX Architecture Enhancements Vs. Previous Gen.

A summary of the Nehalem-EX features and benefits includes:

Intel Nehalem Architecture built on Intel’s unique 45nm high-k metal gate technology process
Up to 8 cores per processor
Up to 16 threads per processor with Intel Hyper-threading
Scalability up to eight sockets via Quick Path Interconnects and greater with third-party node controllers
QuickPath Architecture with four high-bandwidth links
24MB of shared cache
Integrated memory controllers
Intel Turbo Boost Technology
Intel scalable memory buffer and scalable memory interconnects
Up to 9x the memory bandwidth of previous generation
Support for up to 16 memory slots per processor socket
Advanced RAS capabilities including MCA Recovery
2.3 billion transistors

The Intel Nehalem-EX is scheduled for production in the second half of 2009, with systems coming from Intel's typical partners in the high-end server space. Intel has not commented on clock frequencies just yet, but if they can come close to existing products, the Nehalem-EX platform could have a major impact on the HPC space, as well as high-end server market.

Case in Point: The Best CPU under $300

News — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:43:21 GMT

I’ve recently built up two midrange Core i7 based systems, which I discuss on my blog at Improbable Insights. One is based on Bloomfield, more specifically, the popular (among performance enthusiasts, anyway) Core i7 920. The other is the new Lynnfield-based Core i7 860. What’s interesting is the similarity in pricing between the two systems. I’ll talk about the individual system builds, but I also want to explore why you might build one type of system over the other.

These systems are similar, but don’t have identical components (motherboards obviously differ.) But they are good case studies into what to think about when building a system that has some legs.

Both CPUs are priced identically on Intel’s price list -- $284 – but differ in other respects. Both have advantages and disadvantages. Let’s dig into the details of each system, then do a little postmortem analysis...

Case in Point: The Best CPU under $300

Intel's Light Peak Connector To Ship In 2010?

News — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:56:28 GMT

We had a look at Intel's newest connection standard, Light Peak, during our stay at IDF last week. To be honest, we were floored by the possibilities. Optical cabling has always had huge potential, so it makes perfect sense to see Intel really pushing such a standard during a time with bandwidth is in high demand and data can't possibly be moved quickly enough.

Here's an interesting twist on the whole thing: it seems as if Apple has a whole lot to do with it. Yeah, Apple! Now, Apple and Intel have been on speaking terms for quite a few years now. In fact, if sales of the company's Intel-based computers are any indication, we'd say Intel is quite pleased to have the California-based company as a partner. The MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac and Mac Pro machines all ship with Intel processors, and if certain reports are accurate, it seems as if the two companies have more in common than a simple CPU relationship.

Reportedly, Apple actually came to Intel with a cable proposition way back in 2007, shortly after the original iPhone (remember that thing?) was launched. Apple has always been a company that things differently. It's a motto, and it's a way of doing business. Thus, we're not shocked to hear that Apple was hoping to have Intel develop some sort of contraption that would allow users to pipe basically everything (video, peripherals, etc.) through a single "Light Peak" cable via a breakout box.

Details are thin at the moment, but it seems as if Apple machines could start shipping with Light Peak (and a breakout box) as early as next year. If we're envisioning this correctly, users would hook up their mice, keyboards, hard drives, scanners, monitors, etc. to a breakout box, and then connect that box to their Mac via a single Light Peak connector. We know, that sounds kind of pointless right now, but it does allow for very thin computers to have lots and lots of connectivity options. Imagine if your iPhone could dock to your Mac. Or what it Apple finally comes out with that tablet PC that has been rumored for so long?

Either way, what we're most excited about is the prospect of seeing Light Peak in action during 2010. If mainstream PCs begin to ship with this, the sky really is the limit when it comes to connections. The only question is this: will Intel sell Light Peak PCIe expansion boards, or will we have to shell out for all new motherboards?

Intel Launches New TV-Oriented SoC; Predicts TV Revolution

News — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:48:06 GMT

The fusion of the Internet and television, once thought to be as natural as peanut butter and chocolate, has proven to be a tricky problem for would-be content producers. Consumers have embraced direct downloads, but the concept of the television-as-interactive-device has never found traction in a shipping product. Intel wants to see that change, and has launched a new SoC (system-on-chip) family meant to give content creators and users a broader range of options and a better overall experience.

The new CE4100 series will replace Intel's older CE3100, which launched last year. Unlike that chip, which was built around a low-power iteration of the Pentium-M with a clockspeed of 800MHz, the new SoC is built around an Atom core and will be clocked at speeds up to 1.2GHz. The newer CE4100 should draw significantly less power than the C3100; the new SoC is built on a 45nm process whereas the CE3100 still used 90nm technology.

Block diagram of Intel's CE4100 chip - Bringing interactive HD TV to a set-top box near you?

The CE4100 also swaps the Intel GMA 500-based hardware in the 3100 family for PowerVR's SGX Series 5. Exactly what this means for a television isn't clear; but Intel will offer the PowerVR solution at two different speeds.

The CE4100 and 4130 will run the SGX Series 5 at 200MHz, while the CE4150 offers an "Extreme Graphics" option at 400MHz. The CE4150 will also offer an AV input option, which could theoretically be used to facilitate the application of image filters or for photo editing. The ability to hook a camera directly to the television, crop/edit photos or video, and then directly upload to the appropriate website could appeal to a certain market segment that's uncomfortable performing the same procedure on a computer (or who don't want to fuss with one). In order for even this basic concept to catch hold, however, OEMs like Samsung or Sony would need to develop simple, easy-to-use UIs.

Intel has a product development framework for TV-centric applications (aka widgets). The Widget Channel Technology Brief defines widgets as: "small Internet applications designed to compliment and enhance the the traditional TV watching experience and bring content, information and community features available on the Internet within easy reach of the remote control."

The concept has yet to catch on, despite the fact Intel and Yahoo jointly announced the creation of the Widget Channel just over a year ago. Device manufacturers have pledged to support the Widget Channel in future products, but none have yet materialized. To be fair, this may be because of the worldwide financial crisis; several large electronics manufacturers delayed their production of OLED televisions as a result of the downturn.

Either way, Intel is forging ahead, and it brought partners along to say so. "The architecture of Intel media processors provides a powerful and innovative platform to showcase Flash-based applications in a vivid way," said David Wadhwani, general manager and vice president, Platform Business Unit at Adobe. "Flash Player 10 combined with the performance of the Intel media processor and its support for standards such as OpenGL ES 2.0 offers a compelling environment for Flash-based games, videos and other rich Web content and applications." The companies expect Adobe Flash Player 10 to be available in the first half of 2010 for Intel media processor-based CE devices.

Actually games that use the television as more than a display may seem far-fetched, but the idea is on Intel's radar. Intel highlighted the 3D and HD capabilities of the new family, which includes support for hardware-level MPEG2, MPEG4 Part 2, VC-1, and H.264. Vikas Gupta, president of TransGaming, was also on hand to talk up the benefits of the Intel CE platform. "At TransGaming, we're in the business of enabling existing games to operate on alternative operating systems," said Gupta. "Since Intel CE processors run on Intel architecture, it's a fast and easy migration from the PC to the CE platform."

TransGaming has yet to field any major titles but has several projects in development; more information is available at the company's website. Gaming seems an unlikely "killer app" given the Wii/PS3/XBox 360 trio, but the right sort of casual game library and a low pay-to-play fee could catch on.

IDF Day 2 Coverage, Mobile Computing: Defining Cool

News — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:14:55 GMT

The second day of IDF kicked off with a fevered pitch of mobile technologies while Intel's Dadi Permutter and Mooley Eden stepped through a slide deck and several tech demos that gave us a view of where Intel is today with their new generation of Core i7 Mobile "Clarksfield" technology and of the future generation products like Intel's upcoming Arrandale processor with integrated graphics.

Historically the focus on mobile computing has always been to reduce power consumption, increase battery life and processor speed as well as capitalize on the obvious thin-is-in trend. However, moving forward Dadi suggested that new Intel technologies will afford us new usage models and applications, like real-time language translation, for example...

IDF Day 2 Coverage, Mobile Computing: Defining Cool

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 CPU Review

News — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:20:50 GMT

It was not too long ago that the web was buzzing with dual-core versus quad-core debates. Sides were taken and lines were drawn. At that time, one of the main arguments against quad-core processors was their high asking price. But as time passed and manufacturing refinements were made, costs steadily decreased and quad-cores found their way into the more mainstream market segments. And before you knew it, a price war was imminent.

Intel and AMD have been going at one another for years. With AMD unable to compete well at the ultra high-end of the market, however, their focus shifted towards the mainstream market segments. As always, Intel responded and their most recent salvo comes in the form the affordable Core 2 Quad Q8400 processor. Since the Q9400, a 2.66GHz Yorkfield quad-core, was already on the market, why did Intel feel the need to release another, affordable quad-core model? One reason could be to increase yield and utilize dies that would otherwise be discarded. Another reason would be to position another product at the same price point as AMD's. Whatever the case may be, competition is always good for the consumer as it usually drives prices lower and provides more options to choose from. With that in mind, let's take a look at the Intel Core 2 Quad 8400 to see if it's worthy of consideration for your next build...

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 CPU Review

Intel 32nm Clarkdale and Arrandale Processor Preview

News — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:08:48 GMT

Although Intel talked about their upcoming 32nm Westmere-based processors at IDF, and even showed off a few demos of the next-gen core at work right on stage, we still got in some private face-time with a few Intel reps and engineers in a closed door session to glean a few more details.

A couple of the items we saw firsthand were Intel's upcoming Clarkdale (not to be confused with Clarksfield) and Arrandale processors. If you're unfamiliar with Clarkdale and Arrandale, they are upcoming mainstream desktop and mobile processor offerings based on the Nehalem microarchitecture, manufactured on Intel's 32nm process node.

Like other Nehalem derivatives, Clarkdale and Arrandale will feature Intel Turbo Boost and HyperThreading technologies, but they'll also sport on-processor graphics and hardware acceleration for AES (Advanced Encryption Standard)...

Intel 32nm Clarkdale and Arrandale Processor Preview

Intel Reveals 22nm Chips And Atom Developer Program At IDF

News — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:56:49 GMT

Think 32nm is hot stuff? That's nothing. Today at the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco, Intel showcased a silicon wafer containing the world's first working chips built on 22nm process technology. The 22nm test circuits included both SRAM memory as well as logic circuits to be used in future Intel microprocessors, and these days, any reduction in process technology size is a fairly significant step forward. And to think--Intel has introduced not one step down, but two in a single year. While we're currently using 45nm chips, Intel has showcased 32nm processors and now 22nm processors within the span of about six months. Paul Otellini, Intel's head man, had this to say about the announcement:

"At Intel, Moore's Law is alive and thriving. We've begun production of the world's first 32nm microprocessor, which is also the first high-performance processor to integrate graphics with the CPU. At the same time, we're already moving ahead with development of our 22nm manufacturing technology and have built working chips that will pave the way for production of still more powerful and more capable processors."

The 22nm wafer displayed by Otellini is made up of individual die containing 364 million bits of SRAM memory and has more than 2.9 billion transistors packed into an area the size of a fingernail. Pretty insane, yeah? Here's a blurb from Intel on its upcoming plans--you know, since 32nm stuff is so early 2009.

"By continuing to lead in manufacturing technology Intel is able to innovate and integrate new features and functions into its processors. Intel's 32nm process is now certified and Westmere processor wafers are moving through the factory in support of planned fourth quarter revenue production. Following the move to 32nm Intel will subsequently introduce Sandy Bridge, Intel's next new microarchitecture. Sandy Bridge will feature a sixth generation graphics core on the same die as the processor core and includes AVX instructions for floating point, media, and processor intensive software."

In other news, the company also introduced the Atom Processor Developer Program. This is a pretty big move in the netbook space, as it's the first to actually encourage developers to code programs specifically for netbook (and in the future, handhelds/smartphones) use. We've long since believed that netbooks needed more software catered to it; as it stands, a netbook is experience is just Windows XP smashed onto a smaller screen with less powerful hardware. Things could be made much more enjoyable with software that was engineered to work on a small panel with an energy-efficient (and admittedly less powerful) processor.

"The program provides a framework for developers to create and sell software applications for netbooks with support for handhelds and smart phones available in the future. Through the program, developers seeking to reduce overhead and streamline the creation of new applications may also license development tools and application modules directly from other independent developers and independent software vendors (ISVs)."

Both Dell and Acer are already onboard with the program, and it sure sounds as if this is just the beginning of future netbook app stores. Now that would be something of interest! Developers can learn more about the program, APIs, validation process and application store framework through appdeveloper.intel.com. Applications for ISV and software developer memberships are currently being accepted. Members will be given access to tools and resources that will aid the pre-development process. The Intel Atom Developer Program software development kits will be available to members in late fall.

Finally, Intel closed out the first day at IDF with a plea for young designers to explore out-of-the-box ideas on mobile computing as part of the University Design Expo. Intel sponsored students from several colleges and universities from around the world to explore creative new ways to bridge technology and design across the areas of user interaction, industrial design, and mobile applications and solutions. The projects have the potential to impact the broad spectrum of mobility – from next-generation laptops to compact, pocketable handheld devices. Everything is on display out at IDF, and we'll be sure to pass along anything that looks particularly amazing.

Intel Developer Forum Day 1 Coverage, The Continuum

News — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:57 GMT

We made our annual pilgrimage to Intel Developer Forum this year and upon arriving in sunny San Francisco, we were greeted with the usual IDF fanfare in a sleek, modernistic environment. Presentations and demonstrations of Intel's latest cutting-edge technologies awaited us in the lobby as we noshed a bit on the continental breakfast buffet, but the glitz of table top demos were not what we really were after.

Intel's Sean Maloney introduced Intel President and CEO, Paul Otellini setting the backdrop for this year's Intel Developer Forum with the big idea behind the company's conference theme: The Continuum. Intel's Continuum is a concept and vision of the future of technology where all devices inter-operate together seamlessly, from desktops, to notebooks, netbooks, and hand-held devices all leveraging standard platform technologies and cross-platform compatibility in software...

Intel Developer Forum Day 1 Coverage, The Continuum

Intel Core i5, Core i7 800 and P55 Express Chipset, Burned In

News — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:10:13 GMT

With today's launch of their new "Lynnfield" based Core i5 and i7 800 series processors, and the accompanying P55 Express chipset, Intel's current flagship CPU microarchitecture--codenamed Nehalem--finally trickles its way down into the mainstream computing segment. Since Nehalem first landed on the desktop in the form of the Core i7 line of processors, it has unequivocally owned the performance segment of the market. They are simply the fastest desktop processors currently available, bar none. But while the Core i7 was riding high, Intel still had the established Core 2 line-up to satisfy the mainstream, though meeting market demand for a refresh here as well was obviously the end game.

Along with the new Core i5 and Core i7 800 series processors and P55 Express chipset, also come a plethora of new features and changes. While the Core i5 and i7 800 series processors are based on Nehalem and share similar execution cores, with these new processors, Intel has changed the integrated memory controller configuration, brought PCI Express connectivity on-die, and revamped their Turbo Mode functionality to offer varying levels of increased performance depending on the type of application being used. These new processors also require a new socket, new coolers, and the P55 Express chipset--which is an elegant single-chip solution.

There's a lot of information to cover to fill you all in on the pertinent details regarding the Core i5 and i7 800 series processors and P55 Express chipset. So we'll dive right in. First up we have some specifications on tap, and then we'll follow up with architectural and platform details, and a full performance breakdown using a trio of P55-based motherboards. Lots to see; let's get to it...

Intel Core i5 and i7 Processors and P55 Express Chipset

Intel Core i5 Processor On The Intel DP55KG "Kingsberg" Motherboard

Intel Confirms Westmere Waiting in the Wings

News — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:30:43 GMT

If early reports are accurate, Westmere—Intel's GPU/CPU fusion—will take center stage at the company's developer forum next week. The new processor has been a topic of interest for months, especially after Intel announced it was scrapping its plans to build both the CPU and GPU on a 45nm process. The company's strong 32nm ramp allowed it to skip straight to a 32nm CPU / 45nm GPU combination, which should decrease the chip's overall power consumption. Mobile Westmere processors are expected to ship in Q4 2009; it's currently unclear if the desktop variant will launch in Q4 or in Q1 2010.

If you're confused over which code name applies to which processor, Intel's decoder ring might be of some help. Westmere, like Penryn, is the name of an entire processor family, not just one type of processor. Clarkdale is the name of Intel's upcoming 32nm (dual core, HyperThreaded) desktop chip, while Arrandale refers to the mobile flavor. The one oddity in the diagram is that Lynnfield falls off the map, leaving a quad-core-sized hole in Intel's product lineup. It's possible that Lynnfield's refresh might occur after the desktop and server products are transitioned.

Dual-core processors with an integrated GPU might not sound like much to get excited about, but Clarkdale and Arrandale are the first Nehalem-based mainstream processors. That places them in direct competition with Intel's budget Celeron and Core 2 offerings, as well as the company's current mass-market chipsets. How bumpy or smooth the launch is will depend on how adroitly Intel can measure consumer demand and its own inventory levels. Expect at least a few bumps along the way, as OEMs adjust their product lines to feature Westmere processors while reducing their inventory of Core 2 chips.

CyberPower Unleashes Factory Overclocked Intel Core i5 & Core i7 800 Gaming Rigs

News — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:22:59 GMT

If you’re looking to take advantage of Intel’s new Lynnfieldbased Core i5 and i7 800 series processors, and don’t want tobuild a rig yourself, then CyberPower’s latest systems might be just what you’relooking for. In all, CyberPower is offering five new customizable, highperformance gaming rigs that can be overclocked directly from the factory. Thebase price for the Gamer Xtreme i5/i7 systems with P55 chipset starts at $749. Checkout the press release below for more details on these new rigs.

CyberPower Announces New Factory Overclocked Intel Core i5 and Core i7800 Gaming Rigs

Get Your VenomBoosted Core i5 and i7 Rigs

BALDWIN PARK, CA (September 8, 2009) – CyberPower Inc., www.cyberpowerpc.com amanufacturer of custom gaming machines and an Intel Premium Channel Partner,today announced five new high performance gaming rigs based on Intel’s new Corei5 and Core i7 800 Series processors along with Intel’s P55 chipset.

CyberPower customers can begin customizing and configuringtheir Core i5/i7 gaming rigs in tandem with Intel’s official launch onSeptember 8th.

CyberPower will initially offer five new models in its GamerXtreme 1000 to 5000 series, which will feature Intel’s LGA 1156 Core i5 or i7processors with a choice of new Intel Core i5 750 (2.66GHz), i7 860 (2.80 GHz),and i7 870 (2.93 GHz) CPUs. Customers will have several new P55 chipsetmotherboards to park their new processors in from leading motherboard manufacturerssuch as Gigabyte, Asus, EVGA, and MSI.

Intel’s “Lynnfield” i5/i7 processors and P55 chipset provideenhanced performance for digital media creation and demanding multi-tasking andexcellent graphics options for gaming.

The Core i5 features intelligent performance, whichautomatically adjusts the processing power and speed of your processor to yourworkload demands. Intel’s Turbo Boost Technology easily increases the speed ofyour CPU without manipulating settings in the motherboard bios. The newprocessor architecture also features an integrated dual channel DDR3 memorycontroller for improved responsiveness and performance.

The new line of Gamer Xtreme models will also featureCyberPower’s Venom Boost technology, which provides factory overclocking withfull warranty. For a limited time offer, customers can request a free Pro OCVenom Boost, which overclocks the CPU 10% or more.

CyberPower will also offer a free Windows 7 upgrade couponwith the purchase of selected Windows Vista Operating System Installed. Base price of the Gamer Xtreme i5/i7 systemswith P55 chipset start at $749. All systems can be ordered directly fromCyberPower and other e-tailers (e.g. Newegg, Tigerdirect, Amazon, PC Club). http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/LandingPages/intel/i5/

i7 950 vs Xeon X5570 - for gaming??

smoket22 — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:04:04 GMT

HI all

I have a bit of a problem. I recently purchased the Intel i7 950 processor for my home machine which is primarily used

for gaming purposes. Accidentally, I was sent the new Xeon X5570 process (which is considerably more expensive than the

processor I ordered). The retailer has told me that I may keep the Xeon processor if I wish, however i'm not sure how suitable

it is for gaming. I guess my question is simply, will the Xeon X5570 perform for gaming purposes as well as a standard i7 950?

Anyone got any ideas?

Thanks

Tom

Intel Expanding Core Branding, Killing Centrino

News — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:33:43 GMT

Just recently, we were able to sit down with Intel and talk shop about its newest (and most powerful) Core i7 yet, and apparently the company is really fond of that "Core iX" naming convention. So enthused, in fact, that they have just announced plans to phase out some of its brands -- including "Centrino" in order to hone in on fewer top names. Granted, we've certainly seen Intel and others try this re-branding thing before. Remember when megahertz ratings were all the rage?

Now, Intel will stop using Centrino and start using more "Core" names, but the re-brand won't go into effect until next year. Oddly, Centrino will no longer about to just personal computers; instead, it will refer to Wi-Fi and WiMAX-based wireless products. Which certainly feels confusing to us, but hey, who are we to judge? Also, sub-brands such as "Core 2 Duo" will also be shoved out the door, again using a supposedly simpler "Core ix" moniker to refer to different variations of products.

To quote: "The company plans to repackage its Core family of microprocessors with a simpler naming scheme -- the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 -- describing basic, mid-range and high-end features within the Core line, respectively." Of course, this announcement also proves that the Core i5 mid-range chip is more than just a rumor, with recent reports slating its launch "in the coming months."

To complicate the simplification further, Intel's hanging onto Atom, Celeron and Pentium.

Can i upgrade my PC to core2Duo/Quad-core ?

varunmehta11 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:14:40 GMT

I have a Lenovo Desktop PC. I want to upgrade its Pentium 4 Processor to a Core 2 Duo or a Quad-core. Will there be any improvement in gaming and other software performance by this upgrade? If yes, then suggest me a budget CPU with decent performance in gaming (complimenting my Geforce 8400 GS) and other tasks and could survive for 2 to 3 years decently. I can’t upgrade anything apart from the CPU (b’coz of just 300W PSU Oem fitted which has a special power slot for my Lenovo LCD Monitor therefore can’t upgrade the PSU).
Also I have few other queries:
Does the Core 2 Duo or Quad-core consume more power than a P4 cpu ?
Also I get the details about the Motherboard name and Model as “To be set by O.E.M” in the CPU-Z and EVEREST Ultimate software. So how can I know if my motherboard is upgradeable to a Core 2 Duo and so I can’t even get the BIOS update, (I’m just getting a Chipset Driver update from the Lenovo Support webpage). I just have the following System Details of my PC :
Chipset : Intel 945G
Motherboard : “To be set by O.E.M” (in CPU-Z) but in Everest it shows “Intel i945G”
Socket : LGA 775
Processor : Intel Pentium 4 3.06 Ghz HT with EM64T
GPU : XFX Geforce 8400 GS 256 MB
RAM : 2 GB DDR2 Dual-Channel

Great deal on an I7 system

rapid1 — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:53:20 GMT

http://www.ewiz.com/category.php?categry=1

This was sent to me today. Copy and paste it there is a great deal on an almost compete I7 920 system for a few dollars over a grand. This combo has awesome components for the price. There are a couple I would change (memory speed) but other than that this is a great deal on a system. It includes a cpu (920), gpu(4790), psu(anan 750 pure), mb, hd(1TB), memory(1333 6GB), and a good case to for under 1100 dollars. I am not associatted with them in any way, this is just an awesome deal.

Intel Core i7 975 Extreme Edition Reviewed

News — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:49:05 GMT

Today Intel is finally releasing new Core i7 models and speed bins to the market, as well as announcing a new flagship chip, the Core i7-975 Extreme Edition. Though it will definitely command a hefty price tag, at a stock clock speed of 3.33GHz and Intel Turbo Boost speeds at 3.45GHz (all cores) and 3.6GHz (single core), you can bet this new Core i7 is one hot-rod of a quad-core CPU.

In the pages ahead, we'll wind it out around the test track and show you what the fastest desktop processor on the planet can do when it's tuned up for a touch more horsepower at the factory and made ready for production.

Intel Core i7 975 Extreme Edition, Tested and Burned In

Computex: Intel Debuts New Core 2 Duo, ULV CPUs

News — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:06:57 GMT

Computex has up in full swing over in Taipei, and while we've already heard news from a few outfits, we have yet to see anything substantial from Intel. Until now. Today, the company is launching quite a few new products, with a trio of new Core 2 Duo processors leading the way. The T9900, P9700 and P8800 are all being debuted alongside the new Intel Pentium ULV SU2700 and Mobile GS40 Express Chipset.

To be completely candid, we would've much rather seen new Atom processors on deck, but we suppose we'll take what we can get. The idea here is for Intel to offer more products that can be used within the burgeoning "thin-and-light" market sector. With machines like Asus' Eee PC 1008HA and MSI's X-Slim X340, there's obviously a need for low-power, high-output chips in ultrathin notebooks.

In a press presentations (slides are all listed throughout; click any to enlarge), Intel confessed that sheer performance was still atop the minds of mobile users. That was followed closely behind by data protection, battery life and on-board wireless LAN. The company showed a clear understanding that "thin is in," with a survey showing that smaller devices such as a UMPC or netbook is twice as likely to be removed from the home setting as a standard, full-size notebook. We aren't told specifically when these chips will ship nor how expensive they'll be, but we anticipate Intel filling us in shortly.

In related news, the company also made a point to showcase its leadership in WiMAX deployment. Currently 16 OEMs have pledged WiMAX support, with 35+ certified models from six OEMs in America alone. It's not too far-fetched to think that Intel would try to push new notebooks with its new processors and built-in WiMAX modules, and we wouldn't even be surprised to see a few demo units on the Computex floor.

Intel Reportedly Delaying Core i5 Processors

News — Tue, 26 May 2009 14:43:39 GMT

Oh, brother -- again already? Just days after we heard that Intel was delayed its long awaiting Itanium chip to better its performance before shipping, in flies word that the chip maker is delaying yet another processor, and this one's arguably even more significant. Needless to say, Intel's Core i7 has been a huge hit with gamers and multimedia lovers alike, and it has no doubt generated millions for the company.

Now, the processor's lower-end brother, which was on track to debut this July, will reportedly slip to early September. Indeed, we were even hearing about the Core i5 (codenamed Lynnfield) during CeBIT in March, but evidently things haven't gone quite as planned in Intel's laboratories. The news comes from undisclosed "sources at motherboard makers," which we tend to believe. Gigabyte was already showing off a Core i5 motherboard a few months ago, leading us to believe that the CPU was already dangerously close to market-ready.

So, why the wait? Naturally, the ailing economy is being blamed, with reports suggesting that Intel is simply pushing the Core i5 back in order to get more of its current inventory off of the shelf. Problem is, that's less likely to happen now that we know something better is just around the bend. As of now, we're expecting Core i5s to launch in 2.93GHz, 2.8GHz and 2.66GHz models, which will initially be priced at $562, $284 and $196 in 1000-unit quantities, respectively. If all goes well, they'll be available in the retail channel in early August, with suitable mainboards appearing even sooner. So, what are the chances these get pushed back yet again?

Itanium Delayed Again While Intel Improves It

News — Fri, 22 May 2009 14:17:45 GMT

It's hard to say if there is anything to this, but it's certainly interesting at the very least. For years now, Intel has been notoriously good at shipping its products on time. If Intel says a chip is coming in a certain quarter in a certain year, it'll be there. On the other hand, AMD has been the polar opposite; year after year, the chip maker has announced delay after delay, spoiling even the hopes of diehard fanatics.

Now, however, the tables seem to be turning, albeit slightly. While Intel's dealing with a $1.45 billion fine, Advanced Micro Devices is enjoying the success of its Neo platform and finally holding its head up high. Furthermore, Intel is now delaying a chip of its own -- for the second time. If you'll recall, its next generation Itanium chip line was originally scheduled to launch in early 2009, and now that said time window has come and gone, we're hearing of yet another setback. Now, Intel is saying that Tukwila won't hit the market until Q1 2010, and we're beginning to wonder how serious it is even about that.

Still, Intel's spinning this in a way that makes it seem at least somewhat responsible here. In a statement, the company said that "during final system-level testing, we identified an opportunity to further enhance application scalability." In other words, we're being forced to wait because Intel is improving upon the product. Sure, that sounds fantastic, but it can only work in the court of public opinion for so long. Meanwhile, AMD's taking the opportunity to boast about the early release of Istanbul -- got to love the rival instinct, don't you?

Intel Details Pine Trail Platform And Moblin v2

News — Wed, 20 May 2009 16:23:34 GMT

We already knew that Intel was pushing Moblin mighty hard, but now the evidence of its fondness is just overwhelming. In a new deck of slides released this week, Intel has detailed Pine Trail and Moblin, hailed as its next generation platform for netbooks and nettops. Intel also made known that Moblin version 2 Beta was now available for download.

Speaking of Pine Trail, that's the codename for Intel's next Atom platform, which is currently on schedule to be released "later this year." It'll feature a 3-to-2 chip partition for increased performance and lower average power consumption, and considering just how long in the tooth the current Atom lineup is getting, we'd say the sooner the better.

Have a look at the slides below for more details on Intel's future netbook / nettop plans, and feel free to give Moblin v2 a run to see just how impressed you will (or won't) be with next year's MIDs and UMPCs.

Intel CEO Voices Positivity About Future Sales

News — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:11:15 GMT

Good news for Intel, chip makers, PC manufacturers and the economy at large: Intel's CEO is seemingly upbeat about the industry, and recently stated that things were "so far, so good" in Q2. The comment came from the top man Paul Otellini, where we was addressing analysts during a conference call this week. Specifically, he noted that chip orders have been "a little better than expected," and compared to how rough Q1 was, this news is even more wonderful to hear.

Mr. Otellini also proclaimed that he stood by his previous remarks that PC sales have "bottomed out," noting that things seem to be on the rebound and should only get better from here. Better still, Q3 and Q4 are typically very strong for chip makers and PC vendors, as back-to-school and holiday demand typically drives higher than usual demand. Needless to say, Wall Street reacted quite positively to all the positivity, sending Intel's stock up by around 3% in after-hours trading after he made the comments.

Of course, it remains to be seen what'll happen to Intel regarding the whole European Union ruling that claims the company engaged in anti-competitive practices that swayed partners from buying from AMD. That said, it's still great to hear Intel voicing this kind of hope with investors watching -- we seriously doubt Paul would be so forthright if he really had reservations about future orders.

Can i upgrade my processor ?

varunmehta11 — Thu, 07 May 2009 18:59:08 GMT

I have a HP Pavilion 8505, year 1999 model. It's having a Pentium III 450 Mhz clock and 100 Mhz FSB cpu. It's a Katmai Slot 1 SECC2 processor. I want to upgrade the cpu to 800 Mhz. But i think katmai CPUs have max 600 Mhz clock rate. Will 800 Mhz Coppermine be compatible with my ASUS P2B-VT Motherboard having Intel 440BX Chipset ? If no, then would upgrading the RAM from 192 mb to 384 mb (max possible) improve the system performance instead of the above mentioned cpu upgrade ?

Basically i'm upgrading this pc for improving the internet surfing(cos' browser is working slow), a lot of downloading and also some applications sometimes takes 30 sec - 1 minute to start up. Does a change from 450 Mhz to 800 Mhz Cpu clock would improve the above or the RAM upgrade from 192 MB to 384 MB or Both?

best processor

frank239 — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:21:09 GMT

which is the best processor for laptop?

processor detail in a laptop

tarboor — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:46:53 GMT

I am intending to buy a loptop probably vaio. But heard a lot of stories about different specs to check of a processor, to buy a loptop

could any one guide me what are the things which i should check for the processor and also how to check it out

cheers