<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Consumer - HD/CD/DVD/Flash</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/12.aspx</link><description>Storage For The Masses, data that is...</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Re:</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298781.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:03:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:298781</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/298781.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=298781</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I did some research and it seems that they are pretty good at reading/writing performance too&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Re:</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297832.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:26:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:297832</guid><dc:creator>frg1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297832.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=297832</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;seems like it would be quiter &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re:</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297799.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:20:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:297799</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297799.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=297799</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;any idea if the single platter drives are more silent and have better performance?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title /><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297679.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:13:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:297679</guid><dc:creator>AjayD</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297679.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=297679</wfw:commentRss><description>I&amp;#39;m a bit surprised to see that having only half the cache of most of its competitors results in such a minimal difference in performance. I expected a far more pronounced variance in performance for tasks directly related to cache. Interesting.</description></item><item><title>Western Digital Caviar RE2 750 GB Hard Drive</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297668.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:48:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:297668</guid><dc:creator>News</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/thread/297668.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=297668</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;div class="newsText" id="dvPreComment"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Western_Digital_Caviar_RE2_750_GB_"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH:120px;HEIGHT:100px;" alt="" src="http://www.hothardware.com/newsimages/Item6355/thumb-1.jpg" align="left" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Just in case&amp;nbsp;you missed the new link at the top of the page, we&amp;#39;re&amp;nbsp;writing this morning to let you all know that we&amp;#39;ve just posted&amp;nbsp; a new article here at HotHardware in which we evaluate the features and performance of Western Digital&amp;#39;s Caviar RE2 750 GB hard drive.&amp;nbsp; Western Digital’s RE2 lineup is targeted at workstations and servers, which need lots of disk capacity along with top-notch RAID performance and long-life reliability.&amp;nbsp; At its core, the RE2 lineup is identical to the SE16 lineup for the performance desktop, but the RE2 has a slightly different feature set, along with more robust MBTF (mean-time between failure) ratings and warranties.&amp;nbsp; We test the drive standalone and in a dual-drive RAID 0 configuration.&amp;nbsp; Click the link below and check it out...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Western_Digital_Caviar_RE2_750_GB_"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;"&gt;Western Digita Caviar RE2 750 GB Hard Drive&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="newsTextBody" id="dvBody"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="newsText" id="dvComment"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>