Stealth Start-Up MagnaCom Aims To Revolutionize Wireless Communications With 10db Signal Boost

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,383
Points 1,192,230
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Tue, Dec 17 2013 4:09 PM
Technology development company MagnaCom thinks it has a new wireless approach that could revolutionize wireless communication. That's the bottom-line takeaway from the company's presentation (in-person demonstrations will be given at CES in January). With a sheaf of freshly minted patents and an impressive pitch, MagnaCom is claiming that its use of WAve Modulation (WAM) instead of the current QAM (Quadrature Modulation) will provide the bandwidth next-generation content networks desperately need.

WAM vs. QAM

To understand what MagnaCom is claiming, we need to first talk about the current system. All existing cellular technology is based on QAM. In QAM, data streams are amplitude modulated -- meaning that the strength of the signal is varied over a fixed period of time. Each stream is out of phase with the other by 90 degrees -- meaning that they reach peak and trough at slightly offset times. Digital version of QAM implementations transmit more data in a given power envelope by increasing the number of phases.

This creates fundamental problems as the number of phases grows. In order to add phases but hold power steady, each phase must receive less power. This increases noise and raises the bit error rate, which means high order implementations of QAM are less reliable than lower order implementations. Wider QAM requires a higher SNR (signal to noise ratio) and typically requires more power.

Wave modulation is different -- somehow. That's a little vague, I know, but MagnaCom wasn't willing to go into detail in exactly how its new technology improves on the classic QAM implementation. According to MagnaCom, its new technology can offer a 10dB signal strength increase (which works out to 400% more range than competing solutions). According to MagnaCom, WAM is more efficient, makes better use of available spectrum and can drive farther distances thanks to higher efficiencies.



Note that some of these claims are either/or scenarios -- you can use QAM to push longer distances, or you can hit current distances in less power. WAM supposedly can integrate right alongside QAM in a typical radio and requires only about 1mm of silicon area.



The Long and Winding Road

Because MagnaCom is an IP licensing firm, the next step is showing off its technology via FPGA at CES. It's hoping to attract attention from the likes of Qualcomm and Intel while working with the ITU or IEEE on upcoming wireless standards. The 5G roadmap is far enough ahead that a technology like WAM could theoretically fit into the timetable if it actually delivers as promised. And that, I think, is a significant "if."

Don't get me wrong -- I love the idea of a super-efficient, long-range, resilient, high-speed wireless network system as much as anyone, but it strikes me as significant that the world continues to rely on QAM-era technologies despite the current existence of multiple alternatives. Whether its because of dated infrastucture, spectrum limitations, or frequency interference, we continue to rely on this particular technology.

WAM could theoretically disrupt that system, but it's going to need to offer enormous advantages to shift towards a new wireless architecture. While devices can incorporate WAM and QAM on the same silicon, cell towers and backend infrastructure would need to be upgraded.
  • | Post Points: 65
Not Ranked
Posts 76
Points 500
Joined: Dec 2013

I'll believe it when I see it

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,076
Points 11,645
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Tue, Dec 17 2013 6:39 PM

I spoke with the engineers on the project, and they were fairly confident. I'm more leery of the regulatory, licensing, and ramp costs.

It's not impossible that someone created a better way to utilize available spectrum. It's just that getting that solution in place takes a lot more than a great solution.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,688
Points 104,345
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Tue, Dec 17 2013 7:54 PM

If they can do it, (and the existing Tech companies don't try to squash it) I hope it works. I also hope that this somehow lowers costs for consumers.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Tue, Dec 17 2013 8:40 PM

I'm reading through their patent... and from what I can tell they are using noise and interference that is already in the air and treating it like usable signal and injecting new rf into the "noise" to amplify their own signal.

Where as QAM, typically waits it's turn, and or ends up battling other noise and interference.

To put it simply, QAM fights the waves, and WAM rides the waves.

They have a graph comparing WAM to QAM showing error rates and signal strength in ideal conditions and conditions with interference and noise and the grouping with WAM is much tighter where as QAM is greatly affected by noise and interference.

On paper, this is really cool stuff and definitely could work... but there have been others with these cool ideas that end up blowing up in their faces.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Dec 2013
DJROCK replied on Sat, Dec 28 2013 4:24 AM

One of the shortcomings of "QAM-OFDM" is the excessive frame-time required to convey a useful range of QAM symbols carried on a plurality of closely offset sub-carriers, which are interfering with each other for all but a short readable moment during each frame.

Based on how MagnaCom's "WAM" product virtually plugs into existing "QAM-OFDM" based systems, I sense this is an evolutionary refinement to "QAM-OFDM" which lowers the time that each QAM sub-carrier spends interfering with its counterparts and in due course it provides for shorter frame-times and ultimately greater data thru-put.

Symbol contention caused by closely spaced sub-carriers has always put a limit on the usefulness of "QAM-OFDM" and so "WAM" may be a significant refinement since it seems to plug right in. 

Notwithstanding, digital modulation is undergoing a major revolution at the moment and I can confidently say that newer methods are going to provide exponential improvements all the way around, so I wouldn't bet the entire farm on "WAM" - just a few acres.

DJROCK.com

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS