Intel Planning 15-Core Ivytown Processor For High End Servers

rated by 0 users
This post has 7 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,744
Points 1,209,815
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Sun, Dec 8 2013 2:13 PM

Remember the peak of the megapixel war, where every single camera manufacturer was popping out a new point-and-shoot model with a slightly higher MP rating? It feels like we may be entering a similar leapfrog battle in the silicon world, as the race to produce chips with "more cores than the other guys" hits full stride. Though more cores generally make a meaningful difference in performance in multi-threaded workloads, more pixels don't always result in higher quality imaging if optics aren't up to par. At any rate, a new report suggests that Intel's latest project internally involves a massively packed 15-core Ivytown chip.

The high-end processor will ship first to customers in the enterprise market, with high end servers and the like apt to be first in line for the new platform. Ivytown will be based on Intel's Ivy Bridge-E architecture, and it will assume the top position in Intel's CPU stack over their existing top-end chip, the 12-core Xeon E5 v2. The new 15-core chip will probably head towards 4 to 8-socket servers which generally are only found in high performance mission critical-type applications. But, of course, these types of things can eventually trickle down to consumer products in due time.

AMD, as you may know, already as 16 cores in its newest Opteron 6300 chips. The new Ivytown processors will be built using Intel's 22 nanometer process technology, and will slot into the Xeon E7 v2 server lineup. Naturally, pricing details aren't yet available, but they'll no doubt make a serious dent in the corporate card.

  • | Post Points: 110
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Dec 2013

it ll b like buying a Ferrari ..only few ppl can

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 2
Points 10
Joined: Dec 2013

"high end servers" not few people can, few people shall.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 7
Points 65
Joined: Dec 2013

We need them for our gaming pc,s

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,079
Points 10,000
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: LA, CA
sevags replied on Sun, Dec 8 2013 7:10 PM

Does anyone know why the odd number of cores? Will 1 be a managing CPU? because did yield might be higher per wafer?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,082
Points 11,720
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Sun, Dec 8 2013 8:01 PM

This implies that the 12-core IVB chips Intel launched earlier this year were either partially disabled or that they've got a ful 16-core version. Both are a bit puzzling. Normally they'd never distribute 3 cores out of 15. But building a 16-core variant of IVB-E? Also odd.

Presumably yes, these are 16-core chips with one core disabled, but that doesn't have to be the case.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 180
Points 1,660
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Biddeford, ME

Imagine using that for a desktop processer...It would be crazy for it. especially the motherboards that use 4 sockets for the cpu on it... Imagine gaming with 60 cores.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 361
Points 2,580
Joined: Sep 2011

Yes but the real question most people will ask is can I run Minecraft/crysis/the Sims on it?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS