Mobile Carriers Reject Theft-Preventing Smartphone Killswitch, Would Rather Sell You Insurance

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,716
Points 1,208,580
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Wed, Nov 20 2013 11:12 AM
Smartphone theft (and, let’s be honest with our absent-minded and clumsy selves, loss) is a major problem, and a potential solution proposed by lawmakers in San Francisco and New York has been shot down by the big four wireless carriers.

San Francisco DA George Gascón (who has been working on solutions with New York AG Eric T. Schneiderman) told the New York Times that he had been working with Samsung--a company that makes a great many of the nation’s smartphones--to put antitheft software on the company’s handsets that would give carriers a killswitch to deactivate a stolen smartphone.

George Gascon announcing Save Our Smartphones
Gascon (center) and Schneiderman (second from right) (Credit: Bebeto Matthews/AP)

According to Gascón, carriers AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint nixed the idea, and in emails sent between Samsung and a developer, the alleged reason is that the carriers were worried that a killswitch would cut into the profits they make selling phone loss or theft insurance.

If true, that’s terribly damning.

The CTIA isn’t on board either, though. The trade group believes that a killswitch would create problems with hackers disabling devices with the killswitch, a tactic that could be used against law enforcement and government employees. Instead, the CTIA backs a nationwide blacklist database that prevents stolen devices from being modified and used on other networks, and it also supports legislation proposed by Senator Chuck Schumer that would make altering a device to avoid the database a federal crime.

It sounds like everyone from lawmakers to the CTIA are working hard on solving this problem and need to just get together on the right solution, but if the carriers’ objection to any of it is related to making money, that’s shameful.
  • | Post Points: 50
Not Ranked
Posts 11
Points 70
Joined: Dec 2011
JLeBoeuf replied on Wed, Nov 20 2013 12:18 PM

If true what a bunch of disconnected, incompetent turds. They could make it a selling point that the killswitch is built in to protect their customers. this could arguably raise awareness and cause people to purchase the theft insurance. just wow.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 187
Points 1,755
Joined: Nov 2010
lipe123 replied on Wed, Nov 20 2013 1:30 PM

It's already a common practice in other countries to blacklist stolen IMEI's so those phones can never be activated again.

On the flip side it doesn't stop people stealing phones by the 1000's though because thieves are too stupid to understand that the phone can be blacklisted. I'm from South Africa where crime is practically a career option and people get punched and phones stolen from literally off their ears while they are talking on them all the time. The blacklist option really doesn't help too much, once the petty thief sells the phone to a the next guy up on the totem poll they check it for identity theft options and then trash the phone because they know the phones cant be used again.

The better option is to have an nuke app on the phone to remove personal information like samsung and various other brands already include with the base load of apps.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 108
Points 1,120
Joined: Sep 2012
Location: California
KOwen replied on Wed, Nov 20 2013 2:03 PM

I already have a killswitch/tracker. It's called AVG Mobile and its a free app download.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS