Google Attorneys Argue For Right To Continue Scanning Your Email, Yahoo! Wants In Too

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,913
Points 1,117,760
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sat, Sep 7 2013 2:31 PM

Google has continued to fight for its right to party continue scanning user email in a Californian court this week, with it seeming rather obvious that it's doing little to sway public opinion. The company, as you might recall, has been trying to prove its case that it must scan user email - it's all part of its ability to serve email. Of course, this is absolutely untrue, as many email providers don't make it a point to scan user email. Yahoo! used to be one of those, but through a recent service agreement, it states that it's begun scanning email much like Google does, and for the same purpose.

Google wants to scan user email for the sake of advertising, that much is obvious. Since the company can compile user information from a variety of sources, such as Gmail, Chrome, Picasa and others, it can craft an extremely detailed profile on you - that = scarily accurate advertising.

While few would argue that Google's scanning is entirely automated, it still doesn't sit well with privacy advocates, and really, it's for legitimate reasons. If a company like FedEx scanned our packages to figure out what was inside and then sold that information off to advertisers, it's doubtful anyone would consider that to be a good thing.

Admittedly, this is an issue I'm not foaming at the mouth in rage against. While I'm all for privacy, I personally signed-up for Gmail realizing that my email would be scanned for advertising purposes. Google offers a compelling enough service that I simply can't back away from it. If humans were reading the email, I'd be packing up and looking elsewhere, however.

What tends to bother me more is Google's ability to track what you do online. If you visit Newegg to eye a product, then go to some website that has Adsense ad placements, you're likely to see advertising for that product you just looked at. This, to me, is even scarier than the company's insistence to automatically scan your email - you don't even need to be a Google user for this to happen.

Nonetheless, it's going to be interesting to see where this class action lawsuit winds up. It's going to be difficult for Google to prove that it needs to scan user email when other providers can get by just fine without it.

  • | Post Points: 50
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 245
Joined: Jul 2013

I'll be closing my google+ account, my gmail account, my google wallet account, and removing Chrome from both laptops and desktop I own. It was bad enough they were tracking absolutely everything I did on the internet, now, they are scanning my emails to send me more spam? No thanks.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 25
Points 245
Joined: Jul 2013

Don't forget the FB account you jsut posted from, too.

And call your ISP and cancel, since they have access to every packet you send off your network, not just the ones that are checked by Google.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,479
Points 53,935
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Dave_HH replied on Sat, Sep 7 2013 3:46 PM

So true Tim, unfortunately.

Editor In Chief
http://hothardware.com


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 458
Points 6,985
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: United States
AjayD replied on Sun, Sep 8 2013 2:53 AM

Surprisingly, the idea of Google scanning my email to help personalize the adds they send me doesn't particularly bother me. After all, this information is processed automatically and autonomously by servers running specialized code and algorithms that are beyond the average person's understanding. It's not like they have half the population of India working around the clock to actually read everyone's emails.

That being said, what I do find quite disturbing are the multitude of nefarious uses this wealth of personal data might be put to once it has been gathered. Metadata, innocuous though it may seem, has proven to be anything but. I shudder to think of how the Government must be pining away to get its hands on this data.

 

***** Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. *****

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 651
Points 5,915
Joined: May 2008
Location: Stockholm

«I shudder to think of how the Government must be pining away to get its hands on this data.» That was said tongue in cheek, was it not, AjayD ?... Wink

Henri

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 458
Points 6,985
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: United States
AjayD replied on Sun, Sep 8 2013 4:00 AM

No. Although, I suppose it should have been. The sun is rising all too swiftly upon the shadow of privacy. Please allow me to delude myself a while longer that even a semblance remains.

 

***** Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. *****

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS