Intel's Haswell Takes A Major Step Forward, Integrates Voltage Regulator

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,717
Points 1,208,585
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Mon, May 13 2013 4:38 PM
For the past decade, AMD and Intel have been racing each other to incorporate more components into the CPU die. Memory controllers, integrated GPUs, northbridges, and southbridges have all moved closer to a single package, known as SoCs (system-on-a-chip). Now, with Haswell, Intel is set to integrate another important piece of circuitry. When it launches next month, Haswell will be the first x86 CPU to include an on-die voltage regulator module, or VRM.

If the idea rings a dim bell, it should. This is an approach Intel first discussed back in 2005 during IDF. At the time, the company showed off a Pentium M 738 with a CMOS voltage regulator on-package and claimed that this allowed the company to save large amounts of power by shifting to low power states much more quickly. In 2005, the technology was nowhere near ready for primetime. Now, it is.

Boosting The Race To Zero:

Haswell incorporates a refined VRM on-die that allows for multiple voltage rails and controls voltage for the CPU, on-die GPU, system I/O, integrated memory controller, as well as several other functions. Intel refers to this as a FIVR (Fully Integrated Voltage Regulator), and it apparently eliminates voltage ripple and  is significantly more efficient than your traditional motherboard VRM. Added bonus? It's 1/50th the size.

The good news is that this technique should allow Haswell to draw less power than Ivy Bridge. It'll enter and exit power-saving states more quickly, which allows for more aggressive throttling, and it should run extend system battery life.

The bad news is that building the FIVR on die may hurt CPU temps and overclocking at higher clock speeds. According to leaked (but trustworthy) spec sheets, the upcoming HD 4770K series holds the line on base and turbo clock speeds compared to the 3770K, but increases TDP to 84W, up from 77W. That increase is likely driven by incorporating the FIVR. That doesn't mean the system's power consumption has changed, but a component that used to exist in a separate domain is now being cooled by the CPU heatsink+fan and sits within the same socket.

Whether this ends up shortchanging the CPUs overclocking performance isn't clear yet. Theoretically, the FIVR could become a hot spot under increased load, which would sharply limit OC capability. What's more certain is that the FIVR design is a definite step forward for notebooks, tablets, and smartphones. Haswell is debuting the technology -- we don't know if it's incorporated into the upcoming Silvermont hardware -- but if it works here, it'll be adopted for other products. Long-term, these are the sorts of innovations that'll pry open markets that were traditionally closed to x86 due to high power consumption.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 354
Points 3,075
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada

So, if this is the case, why are people getting crazy *** clocks with it? I think they probably pulled an intel and worked their way around the cons of putting it on the chip, to make sure they have it the way people want.

If the overclocking is rumored to be so amazing, I don't think that this could affect it too much to worry about. Maybe for pros that are clocking super high to break records, but not to the average OC'er

PC Specs:

  • AMD Athlon 64 x2 6400+  Cooled by a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus (push-pull)
  • 2GB DDR2
  • MSI Radeon HD 6450 2GB
  • Stock Dell motherboard
  • 250Gb HDD
  • XFX Pro Core edition 650W PSU
  • Stock Dell inspiron case


  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: May 2013

So does this mean no more overvolting in order to overclock or undervolt for power savings?

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 7
Points 50
Joined: Sep 2012
ASankaran replied on Tue, May 14 2013 2:37 AM

Clever way for INTEL to stop people from overclocking their chips. Need higher clocks, BUY higher clocked chips!

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS