Intel Lifts Veil on Haswell Graphics Branding and Performance

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,664
Points 1,154,965
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, May 1 2013 7:29 PM
Intel is finally offering up details on its Haswell integrated graphics offerings after teasing it at CES 2013, including branding and some performance metrics. With the release of the company’s 4th generation Core processors, Intel’s new integrated graphics will go by the “Iris” moniker.

Meanwhile, Intel’s baseline HD Graphics will also see a bump in performance and capabilities. Now, we’ll see Intel HD 5000 graphics along with the higher-end Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200; previously, these were codenamed GT3 (15W), GT3 (28W), and GT3e, respectively. Iris graphics are primarily designed for mobile devices, and we’ll be seeing them in Intel-based ultrabooks, higher-end notebooks, and desktop AIOs. Intel's upcoming Haswell desktops will still be branded as "Intel HD Graphics." High-end desktop parts will carry the "HD 4600" label, with lower-end parts branded as "HD 4400" and "HD 4200."



Iris brings new features including integrated on-package EDRAM memory for the GT3e part, DX11.1, OpenGL 4.0, and OpenCL 1.2 support, double the bandwidth with DisplayPort 1.2, support for a 3-screen collage display, faster Intel Quick Sync Video performance and fast JPEG decode and MPEG encode.

Intel Iris Graphics performance

Intel is also promising serious overall performance improvements over its own previous integrated graphics offerings. The company boasts that Iris will bring double the 3D performance for U-series and mobile H-series processors over current Intel HD graphics and triple the 3D performance for desktop R-series chips. The R-series chips are the BGA-only variants -- conventional desktop parts will be confined to GT2.

Iris Graphics desktop

Iris Graphics Ultrabook
Above: Iris graphics desktop performance; below: Iris graphics ultrabook performance

Predictably, Iris offers switchable graphics for more efficient power usage in a system with a discrete graphics card. Iris also supports 4k UltraHD displays, which is great to see.

Integrated graphics have come a long way in recent years; Intel HD 2500 graphics were something to see at the time, and HD 4000 graphics have been a terrific way to enable reasonable graphics performance on a variety of devices absent a discrete graphics card. Now, Intel promises a substantial leap forward with its Iris graphics; we can’t wait to lay down some benchmarks and see for ourselves how they fare.


Side-by-side Haswell graphics vs. NVIDIA demo

If Iris graphics from Intel sound promising to you, you’ll be pleased to know that it appears that Intel will be doing something more with Iris before the year is out. “We are excited about what Intel HD graphics brings to your visual experience and think you’ll be impressed with Intel Iris graphics solutions later this year”, reads the Intel blog post. “And, hint hint, we aren’t stopping there.”
  • | Post Points: 65
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 354
Points 3,075
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada

Heck yeah!!!

This looks like amazing news! :D

I wonder if the actual processing performance will show at least some performance gains like this, hopefully they will.

PC Specs:

  • AMD Athlon 64 x2 6400+  Cooled by a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus (push-pull)
  • 2GB DDR2
  • MSI Radeon HD 6450 2GB
  • Stock Dell motherboard
  • 250Gb HDD
  • XFX Pro Core edition 650W PSU
  • Stock Dell inspiron case

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 619
Points 5,260
Joined: Dec 2011

These gpu gains is why I was waiting for the next gen of ultrabooks.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 980
Points 9,055
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: LA, CA
sevags replied on Thu, May 2 2013 1:20 AM

I'm forced to wait as well. I need something in the coming months and have been holding out for haswell. My first choice is a Surface Pro but unfortunately it is the least likely to be upgraded to haswell, MacBook Air 11" probably the first to get it, Lenovo Carbon X1 non-touch, and Lenovo ideapad z400...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 730
Points 5,865
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Lewisville, TX
Clixxer replied on Thu, May 2 2013 1:19 PM

All of this is pretty impressive but hopefully they are focusing more on the ultrabook/mobile world with this than desktop PCs. I still don't see anyone using IGP with the 4770k over a discrete GPU but guess we will know here in the coming month after its released and we get game data in.

My rig - I7-4770K, ASUS Z87-A Mobo, 16 GB Corsair Ram, AMD 7990 GPU, CoolIT AiO Cooler, NZXT H630

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 187
Points 2,015
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Fenton, Michigan

I wish they had a non-integrated GPU version that was less expensive with the same processor power. A lot of us simply don't have a need/want for an integrated GPU and all that means is that we're paying for a built in component that we aren't using. I did some searching and all I could find was information about the integrated video capability.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS