I'm willing to BET Tesla's range predictor is accurate. That's such a fundamental requirement for this vehicle, it would be one of the few things they get dead right. Charge time differences have a lot of dependencies associated with them I'm sure.
Editor In Chiefhttp://hothardware.com
The Driver's timeline may be off... but it is obvious that he did turn down the temperature at one point. And then turned the heat back up at the charge station and then turned it back off.
At the sudden decline at 400 Miles... You also see a fluctuation in the temperature in the car. It is as though he sat in the car with the heat on going no where and then eventually turned it off... Perhaps stuck in traffic? The fluctuation of speed would suggest the same.
He should have charged it more than he did on the last leg of his trip.
But despite all of that, I can understand the anxiety he must have been experiencing, wondering if he was going to make it to the next charge station. It the same as when your gas tank starts to run low and you're not sure how far the next gas station is. Except for him... There is a much great distance between locations he can fill up at. So you have to drive more conservatively and be worried about making it to the next stop the entire time! With more charge stations this will be less of an issue and you can drive the car more how you want to.
It's a $100,000 car... there should not be stipulations with how you drive it.
I drive an electric car every day. This article appears just to be another in a long string of pieces which are written to only sell publications by invoking fear on readers that electric cars will deprive us of a freedom, the freedom to choose where "we" want to drive.
The funny thing about all the negative press I read about electric cars is it is always wrong. As an EV owner/driver I have never been left stranded without a charge, I have never frozen to death in the winter or shriveled up in sweltering heat of summer. Forgetabout the press bashing performance. My little Nissan LEAF will smoke any muscle car off the line - to bad the speed is goverened to 80 MPH because it is probably faster too.
I think I'd quicker trust Motor Trend, which wrote a great review of the car a couple of months ago and even slapped its coveted Car of the Year award on it. Broder's claims conflict a lot of other things I've read about the car.
It's not as simple as saying "The reporter's timeline may be off."
He claims to have driven the car, at some length, at 54 and 45. He did not. He claims the car ran out of power altogether. It didn't. He writes that he charged the car for longer than he charged it. He drove past open charging stations when the vehicle was critically low on power.
"It's a $100,000 car... there should not be stipulations with how you drive it."
Price (and being an electric car) is irrelevant .This is about fuel. There are fuel and range stipulations on all cars.
Let's convert this to a gasoline scenario. Imagine that Exxon developed a new super-gas that could get you 5x farther than an ordinary tank of gasoline. Your test vehicle could still use ordinary gas. You were given a route map of ordinary gas pumps and super-gas locations along the corridor of your intended trip. Your job was to evaluate the efficiency of the super-gas itself.
During your trip, you fill the car with less and less super-gas each time you stop at a super-gas station. You add only small amounts of normal gas. When the vehicle is low on fuel, you drive right past ordinary gas stations. Then, evidently bored, you call a wrecker to tow the car.
If Broder had charged the car for the 58 minutes he claimed rather than the 47 minutes he actually charged it, the vehicle would've had no problems at any juncture. If he'd fully charged the vehicle at any point, he'd have had no problem.
The range anxiety excuse is spurious in this context. People who suffer from range anxiety actually *charge the car to full.*
I've actually read similar articles, not necessarily talking about false advertising, just that the tesla cars so far have been plagued with a lot of minor issues. However, should you have the funds to purchase this car, I would hope you took the time to understand the risk associated with not only a new line of cars, but a new company.
Long live the Tucker!
It is clear that Broder, the agent of the New York Times, has done a deliberate and libelous hatchet job on Tesla Motors. I sincerely hope Elon Musk files suit against them both and ruins Broder. He can go flip burgers for a living, that doesn't require a lot of honest reporting.
Broder's response to Mr. Musk is here:
At this point, who to believe?
I would gladly get a Tesla if it was affordable. It's range is plenty for most of my driving, and it looks fun to drive. I would be inclined to charge it fully each time I stopped for power too.
Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.
My point was really just that both side seem to be exagerrating and trying to stretch the numbers to meet their own personal needs, and I believe the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
My closing comment was irrelevant to the article, simply my own personal opinion. I would not spend $100,000 on a car that I cannot currently drive in a similar manner as a gas powered car. Given the distance between charge stations hooliganism must be kept to a minimum... and I enjoy maximizing my Hooliganism whenever I can in the cars I drive... which is why I bought a Mustang GT lol
Also, if the intent was for him to test their new charge stations, then they should also take into account how people are going to drive a car that is advertised to have 0-60 time of 4.4seconds and looks as sporty as this one does. People are not always going to drive their car like a granny, and I would be annoyed and frustrated if I was forced to drive like a granny in order to reach a destination.
It's like having a delicious cheeseburger with some fries placed in front of you(or whatever your favorite food is) when you're very hungry, and then your given a bowl of raw vegetables and told to eat those while you stare at that delicious burger that you really want... but you're not allowed to eat that burger because something very bad is going to happen to you if you do.
To me it would be like torture to sit in a car capable of so much performance, yet i'm not allowed to explore it because I have to manage my fuel consumption to the next charge station.
And I did agree with you that he should have charged the car more than he did.
Just about every new car is plague with minor (and some not so minor) issues. For example, the new 5.0 in the new Mustang... people have have the number 8 Cylinder burn up on them a few times. Some people have issues with 2nd gear on the 6 speed manual. The new 2013 has functional hood vents that dump water onto the fuse box and air intake when it is raining. That isn't an issue until your fuse box isn't sealed properly or you use an open air filter. The clutch pedal sticks to the floor during aggressive driving... etc. etc.
The car looks fantastic and i love how they caught him out :) such *** boy you got owned :P
This kind of car will take time to adapt to, give it time but this kinda of car is the way of the future.
This is exactly what America needs, to not be dependent on oil for the middle east. This car can only be fantastic for Americans.
I would love to see them here in Australia.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms