Latest Terms for Google's Android SDK Makes It Less "Free"

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,393
Points 1,192,595
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Fri, Jan 4 2013 12:40 PM

One of the biggest things that has set Android apart from iOS all these years is its openness - and that alone is a major reason that many who seek out free (as in libre) software have appreciated it. In fact, this could be one of the biggest reasons Android got off the ground so quickly, as I vividly remember around the time all of the excitement surrounding its focus on freedom. Sure - there have been other "free" mobile solutions, but few have succeeded in any real way. For all intents and purposes, Google seemed to have the right idea.

However, things have just changed. Android's SDK - everything required to rebuild the OS - is now considered non-free software. This means the software cannot be copied, modified, adapted, decompiled, reverse engineered, disassembled or forked. It remains "free" in the sense that you'll still be able to download the SDK to use and view, but modifying it in any way is out of the question.

Admittedly, this change will affect few people, although at least one fork of the SDK did in fact exist (called Replicant). However, the bigger issue here is that Google went back on its willingness to remain open, and adds yet another blemish to its infamous "Don't Be Evil" stance. With this move, those who seek out completely open software are left in a bad place, however it could bode well for Canonical's upcoming phone OS, based on Ubuntu.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Fri, Jan 4 2013 1:11 PM

I think this is a good idea. I think it will help to allow faster updating of devices because this will further reduce the splintering of the multitude of Android OS's on the market.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,694
Points 104,420
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

If it means more cohesive updates across devices, then it's good.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 654
Points 5,945
Joined: May 2008
Location: Stockholm

Looks to me as if Google is getting a bit desperate - compare the pressure put on Acer to cease its planned cooperation with Alibaba over a smartphone using an Android version called Aliyun. As Google tightens on one end, manufacturers with sufficient power will begin to look for alternatives on the other - not merely the Ubuntu OS, but perhaps even more saliently, Samsung's decision to build a handset with a Tizen OS, should, I submit, be viewed in this context. To my mind, this move on the part of Google to something resembling the Apple position is a bad thing for Android development ; on the other hand, it should further open up the field of mobile OSes to new entrants, which strikes me as rather exciting....


Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS