TAKE MY MONEY! D:
Im glad its in the 2560 x XXXX resolutions, but why is 4K being held back so much? :(
@Kidbest100 - Cost is holding 4K back, along with the fact that you currently need multiple DP outputs to power a single display.
Marco ChiappettaManaging Editor @ HotHardware.com
Follow Marco on Twitter
Still happy with HP 2709m, even if it's just 1920x1080, it works really well.
I bought a much cheaper 27 inch ASUS monitor a year ago around black Friday for about $200.00. You could have three of those monitors for the price of this one. I do highly recommend getting a 27 inch monitor though.
This one will be really nice fo sho
Always happy to see more 27" displays coming out to add some more competition into the mix. I really wish prices would come down just a bit more.
Wow this thing is absolutely gorgeous... but is the $700 price tag worth it when I've seen a couple ASUS and other branded 27 inch monitors for almost half the price at $300-$400 with the same specs?
I've only recently started to explore the difference in panel types and I can't say I've ever had viewing angles be an issue on TN monitors or even known that I had owned IPS monitors while people claim IPS looked so much better than TN color wise... (And they were the Samsung/Dell monitors at my families advertising agency where video and photography editing was done so they weren't lower tier in terms of quality and brand)
Is there really that much of a difference between IPS, TN and the new PLS type shown in this monitor?
I would love to see three of these set up in 4320 X 2560. The bezel looks wider on the bottom, but I bet it would still look pretty.
I may be buying one of these, if I can just find a good deal on a graphics card that would allow me to run it at full resolution. But I agree with Kidbest100 and others (including, not least, Linus Torvalds) : what's keeping manufacturers from launching reasonably priced 27" monitors in the 4k range ? If Japan Display can produce and market a 7-inch tablet screen with a resolution of 2560 x 1600, surely we should be able to see a 27" monitor with a resolution of, say, 4096 x 2560 that doesn't cost half a year's wages ?...
Oh Wow Awesome Monitor there, just wish price tag wasn't so steep for me lol, oh well drools anyways, and maybe something can get in the future
mhenriday, If you take a look at monitor prices around, you'll notice that the majority of LCD monitors have dropped in price. I remember buying my 22" 4 years ago and paying over $200. Today you can find a 24" for $199, and if you look around on the used/refurbed market, you can sometimes find 27" for below $200. While the used market is a bad example of falling prices, the prices on new monitors are dropping. Just give it sometime, even VCR's cost 100's of dollars when they first came out.
Dorkstar, here in Sweden high-resolution monitor prices did drop significantly a couple of years ago, but since then they've held steady. I was, however, encouraged to see that the price of the 27" ASUS monitor described here is lower than that of, say, the older Samsung 27" monitors with similar specs ; thus I'm hopeful that even in the monitor field we shall see increasing performance and sinking prices. On the other hand, the fact that desktops seem to have gone out of fashion - despite the fact that, or perhaps just because old fuddie-duddies like myself prefer them - means that competition in the monitor market doesn't seem to be particularly sharp. Still, hope springs eternal - I'd love to see an affordable 27" monitor with a 4096 x 2560 resolution before I depart for a better (or as the case may be, worse) world....
Ahh, you're talking about some serious resolution there man. I know theres a few technology experts pushing for the standard to be raised 2048 x 1536, but i dont see us getting anywhere close to 4096 x 2560 at an affordable cost for quite some time.
Most of these high res monitors are reserved for medical or design etc. I used to purchase parts used in medical equipment repair, one 21", high resolution, black and white, lcd monitor used in identify abnormalities during brest exams cost over $20,000. At least we aren't paying those prices!
Don't forget, Dorkstar, that the monitor which is the subject of this review has a resolution of 2560 x 1440, so the situation is not quite as dire as you paint it. But the question I posed above remains - if Japan Display can produce and market a 7-inch tablet screen with a resolution of 2560 x 1600,
surely we should be able to see a 27" monitor with a resolution of,
say, 4096 x 2560 that doesn't cost half a year's wages ?...
I note that Sharp is soon going to introduce a 32" monitor with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels to the Japanese market. Alas, at a price of, as I understand it, some 450000JPY, it costs about five times as much as I'd be willing/can afford to to pay, but if other manufacturers follow this lead (OK, I know that Eizo RadiForce GX1030CL, a 30" monitor with a resolution of 4096 x 2160 pixels has been on the market for years, but it doesn't seem to have inspired any followers and with a prices some 7½ times that of the Sharp, wasn't of interest for most of us), perhaps we can see prices sink to more reasonable levels within a couple of years....
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms