Can Apple win this twice? LOL!
Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.
Nope. Not if the second trial is held more than 10 miles from their headquarters.
Wait... they could... they seriously could... but I predict that the damages will be so reduced that it's going to die off the radar. The only real winners from the current patent system are the lawyers.
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?
The transcripts (available on groklaw) CLEARLY show that the question was NOT qualified with the 10 years thing. This guy blatantly lied, and is now lying AGAIN about lying.
Here a link to the Groklaw post. Fascinating reading on how a trial should not be conducted. The judgement should be reversed and Apple required to pay Samsung's court costs for both trials. But this is a hometown court, to which driving directions from Cupertino presumably can be found even using Apple maps, so one never knows....
The thing about this is the rewards Samsung will have which are multiple in nature. First they can get it thrown out, second they can get it reduced and they have a billion dollar reward in that case directly, third they can get it declared by that the Jury was prejudiced and seeking a direct outcome which I would think this is the case of for this specific reasoning avenue. Either way the end result are all positive and with a billion dollar bounty attractive in any case. The biggest part is in the end the people who pay for this are Samsungs product consumers which in a very large way are Apples customers as well. SO in the end Apple through this punishes their own customers and looks bad in multiple ways (IE: as a monopoly and a strangler of innovation in the general sense) then also the longer this stays in the public eye the more Apple loses as well.
However, I disagree with "the biggest part is in the end the people who pay for this are Samsung's product consumers, which are in a very large way Apple's customers as well".
Please do not forget Apple made its fortune upon the backs of Apple's customers ONLY.
Whereas, if the jury verdict were to stand, the $1.whatever billion plus Apple's greedy demand it be tripled, would ultimately be passed back on the backs of Apple customers ONLY. Why? Since Samsung manufactures all the single-sourced CPU for Apple. It is easy for the supplier to pass cost increases to their customer, in this specific case, Apple.
Bottom line is regardless of the verdict (which I find repugnant, a travesty of justice) the costs will be passed onto Apple ONLY and indirectly onto Apple's customers ONLY.
Oh, all this BS+RDF from Apple claiming they are the largest single customer of Samsung: The puny USD $10+ bn or so Apple purchases BEGS from Samsung in form of A4, A5, A5X and A6 CPUs + Retina displays (for the iPhone, iPad and MacBook Pro) merely represent less than 3% of Samsung's yearly revenues. Clearly, Samsung could not care less about Apple's business, as they are only snotty bitches causing too much trouble. Apparently, Apple has not learned: "Never bite the hand that feeds you". Way too much hubris in that company of crackpots.
And the cherry on top is found by Googling for Samsung profits on quarterly sales (3 months) of USD $46.8 billion dollars.
The stupidity of Apple. Thinking they could take on Samsung. Hype vs Substance. And should Samsung become annoyed at Apple, they can simply cut them off from any Samsung manufactured essential components. Who's jugular vein is exposed? Like I said: the stupidity of Apple.
The hardest tumble a man can make is to fall over his own bluff.~ Ambrose Bierce, 1842-1914, American Author/Editor/Journalist
While yes billions are at stake for these companys. So many of the lawsuits are frivolous or just digging hoping for money. We the taxpayers have to bear the brunt of court cost judge fees. I mean companys like apple have 100s of lawsuits out against other companys at a time. But they pay a small court fee in my state $50 dollars then they tie up a courtroom and a jury and judge and service staff for a year.
Really to stop this crap we should say ok taxpayers take 20% of winnings and if your case is found to be frivolous you have to pay for all court expenditures.
The silly season seems to have started again - Paul, Dave, someone else at HotHardware, could we get a «Report» button so that postings by the easily amused, like that of «ilee1206» immediately above, can be removed after proper review ?...
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms