Shortcuts

Why The Rumored Quad-Core iPhone 5 Is A Bad Idea

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,804
Points 1,164,195
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Thu, Jul 5 2012 4:06 PM
The iPhone 5 rumor mill is spinning up again after apparently taking a few weeks off due to heat exhaustion. The latest buzz coming out of Taiwan is that the device will feature a quad-core processor based on Samsung's Exynos platform. That would make the Exynos 4412 the most likely candidate for the device, and we've already seen an excellent phone built around that platform -- the Samsung Galaxy S III (although the US version we've looked at here is dual-core Qualcomm Krait).

If the Galaxy SIII is a great phone (and it is), then why would we want to see a quad-core iPhone 5? Simple, we don't. The iPhone has always been about making real-world improvements rather than saturating the market with a flood of feature phones. Quad-cores might be a buzzword way to sell phones, but they don't deliver much in the way of extra performance. Outside of a handful of Nvidia-optimized games (which require a Tegra platform in any case), virtually all phone software is designed for dual cores. Even finding benchmarks that take advantage of quad-cores can be a challenge; the popular Javascript benchmark Sunspider, for example, is single-threaded.


The Samsung Exynos 4412 is a great platform -- but not necessarily the best fit for a next-gen iPhone 5

The Galaxy S III's excellent battery life is proof that Samsung has managed to reduce the basic power consumption penalty of a quad-core device to virtually nothing, but the company has a better SoC already scheduled for a 2H release. What we'd really like to see in the next-gen iPhone is Samsung's Exynos 5 5250 platform. This solution (also referred to as Exynos 5 Dual) is a dual-core CPU based on the ARM Cortex-A15 core. It's clocked faster (1.7GHz vs. 1.4GHz), the CPU is more efficient, and the phone supports 800MHz LPDDR3, rather than topping out at 400MHz LPDDR2.

It's certainly possible that Apple has done a great deal of behind-the-scenes work to optimize iOS 6 for a quad-core device, but the plethora of dual and single-core CPUs on the smartphone market means that the app market will only slowly optimize for quad-core. This is one reason why Intel's Medfield is as competitive as it is with mainstream phones, despite being a single-core + Hyper-Threading, and it's something Apple can take advantage of as well. Four quad-core A9's at 1.4GHz isn't bad, but two 1.7GHz A15's would be faster in a number of tests, and might consume less power as well.

DigiTimes suggests that the quad-core competition overall will heat up substantially in the back half of this year, with new phones based on Nvidia's low-cost "Kai" quad-core platform, 28nm chips from Qualcomm, and fresh competition from Chinese handset manufacturers like Huwei, ZTE, and Meizu. Quad-core A15's will provide the highest overall performance in 2012, but such chips are likely too far out to make an appearance in Apple products this year.
  • | Post Points: 65
Not Ranked
Posts 75
Points 685
Joined: Apr 2011

If Apple could stick in an A15 im sure they would, but like digitimes suggests, they just dont meet the timeframe of building and testing before release. It doesnt really matter though as their customers are not hardware jockeys anyway.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 475
Points 3,795
Joined: Jun 2012

"Quad-cores might be a buzzword" its not a buzzword its a fact.... it has 4 cores in it :P

 

From what i have read Apples IOS is not truly multitasking so it wouldn't really take advantage of quad cores.

I believe iOS will suspended apps.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,539
Points 54,440
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Dave_HH replied on Thu, Jul 5 2012 8:18 PM

Not to mention there's no way in hell a company that Apple has an interest in selling a phone with a Samsung processor under the hood, when you consider how they've been battling them, trying to get injunctions to stop the sale of Samsung phones. Samsung may be the fab for the chip, but that's it.

Editor In Chief
http://hothardware.com


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 983
Points 9,085
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: LA, CA
sevags replied on Fri, Jul 6 2012 1:17 PM

Dave_HH, you're wrong.

Apple and Samsung may have their issues in court but the two still overlap a large portion or their business including using Samsung cpu's and dram.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,539
Points 54,440
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Dave_HH replied on Sun, Jul 8 2012 2:48 PM

sevags, as in branded product by Samsung or fab'ed Samsung product? There is a difference. Last I checked, all hand-held devices from Apple come with A4 or A5 variant, which is core tech by Apple based on ARM cores and some fab'ed by Samsung.

Editor In Chief
http://hothardware.com


  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS