Judge Grants Apple Injunction to Bans Sales of Samsung Galaxy Tabs in U.S., Patent Wars Escalate

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,875
Points 1,116,335
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Jun 27 2012 8:40 AM
The ongoing patent wars are a bit ridiculous and somewhat tedious, even though one of the highest-profile tech patent cases is between giants Apple and Samsung and the stakes are high. Late Tuesday, however, things got interesting.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh (pictured), acting on a federal appeals court’s instructions to revisit her initial decision, has granted Apple’s request to ban sales of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab and Galaxy smartphones because they too closely resemble the iPad and iPhone. As soon as Apple submits a $2.6 million bond (required to cover damages in the event that Apple eventually loses the case), Samsung’s mobile sales will come screeching to a halt.

Banned in the U.S.

What’s even more notable is that Judge Koh granted the ban as a preliminary injunction--the case hasn’t actually been decided yet. Of course, Samsung will appeal the decision, but that will take time. Meanwhile, Samsung’s numerous Galaxy devices, which we’ve found definitely pass muster regarding their legitimacy in the mobile market, are in danger of becoming collector’s items.

Samsung has nothing close to Apple’s mobile market share, but it’s climbed to number two on the strength of the Galaxy devices. With the market getting crowded on various fronts by the likes of Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, Samsung already had serious competition, but now, the company could see its share dip precipitously or vanish altogether should the ruling be upheld.
  • | Post Points: 50
Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 15
Joined: Jun 2012
tzu1978 replied on Wed, Jun 27 2012 9:27 AM

Of course, Samsung will appeal the decision, but that will take time. Meanwhile, Samsung’s numerous Galaxy devices, which we’ve found definitely pass muster regarding their legitimacy in the mobile market, are in danger of becoming collector’s items.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 619
Points 5,260
Joined: Dec 2011

This is honestly such bullshit. Does the 2 or 3 look like an iphone? *** no. What the hell is wrong with these judges. She should be calling them ridiculous and laughing in their faces and straight up denying the claims from all these companies.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,796
Points 45,500
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Wed, Jun 27 2012 5:08 PM

Yes but Cupertino is in California and Tokyo is not so Cupertino wins in a California court room. This case is BS in general as there both smart phones so of course there going to do the same things there just different flavors of the same device. Apples patent crap, and in fact a lot of the patent law in America has hindered as much as helped technology in America I think. I am not saying there is no need for patents but some of them are ridiculous and a plaintiff like Apple that is just throwing mud in some cases should be verbally scrutinized for it. With this case they are just slowing the inevitable loss of business.

 Machine name: rapid1
 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) 
 System Model: Gigabyte X58A-UD5
 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         930  @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.6GHz
 Memory: Kingston 6144MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS