AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,805
Points 1,164,575
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, Jun 22 2012 12:02 AM

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ReviewIt was exactly 6 months ago to the minute that AMD officially took the wraps off its Tahiti GPU and the original Radeon HD 7970. The Radeon HD 7970 was the first graphics card to feature AMD’s “Graphics Core Next”, or GCN, architecture and when it hit the scene, the Radeon HD 7970 proved to be the fastest single-GPU based graphics card available.

Since that time though, NVIDIA went ahead and released their Kepler-based GK104 GPU and the GeForce GTX 600 series of graphics cards. Although GK104 was comprised of fewer transistors and used less power, it ended up outpacing the Radeon HD 7970 more often than not, and propelled NVIDIA back into a leadership position at the high-end of the graphics card market.

As you can imagine, that didn’t sit well with AMD. So, for Tahiti’s half-birthday, they went ahead and refreshed the Radeon HD 7970, by tweaking a few key aspects of the card and adding some new features. The end result is the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition...

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,571
Points 103,110
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Fri, Jun 22 2012 8:01 PM

Nice card. I'd like to try one out.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 653
Points 5,925
Joined: May 2008
Location: Stockholm
mhenriday replied on Sat, Jun 23 2012 7:45 AM

Marco, when this card was tested by the Sweclockers team (http://www.sweclockers.com/recension/15564-amd-radeon-hd-7970-gigahertz-edition - in Swedish), the conclusions reached were much the same as those you list in your summary above. However, a couple of additional things were noted - the so-called «PowerTune Technology» didn't really work as expected ; instead of the card being tested (much the same line up as in your HH test) running at the basic 1000 MHz speed and being «dynamically» boosted to 1050MHz when required, throughout the whole test the card ran consistently at 1050 MHz, save for a dip to around 1020MHz for perhaps a tenth of a second on a single occasion. Moreover, available software does not permit card voltage to be increased over the standard 1.2V (which itself is a minor increase over the standard 1.175V of the standard 7970), which, of course, limits the card's overclocking potential. Thus, according to the Sweclockers reviewers, the HD 7970 GHz amounts to a factory overclocked HD 7970, in which the engine clock has been boosted to 1050MHz from 925MHz, the memory clock to 6GHz from 5.5GHz, and voltage, as noted above, to 1.2V from 1.175V. An owner of a HD 7970 card should therefore be able to attain the same performance levels as the HD 7970 GHz card by means of a relative modest overclocking of his or her card. In other words, the HD 7970 GHz card, while it does take the speed crown from the GeForce GTX 680 (on most applications), doesn't represent anything new....

Love to hear your comments on the above !...

Henri

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,356
Points 48,595
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Sat, Jun 23 2012 12:23 PM

Well, it's the same GPU and PCB, and as I stated the only changes to the card are on the firmware level, so technically the 7970 GHz Edition is just an overclocked 7970. If you'v got (or anyone's got) a 7970 that'll overclock to the same levels, performance will be identical.

AMD also showed me (and a handful of other tech journalists) the card in action a couple weeks back at the AFDS, and the Boost frequency was fluctuating up and down. It's not as granular as NVIDIA's implementation, but it does work.  I'm not sure what that other site used to monitor frequencies, but Overdrive just reports the "high-performance" clock. Not sure GPU-Z reads frequencies properly either, but don't quote me on that one...I'm not certain.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 653
Points 5,925
Joined: May 2008
Location: Stockholm
mhenriday replied on Sat, Jun 23 2012 1:34 PM

Thanks, Marco, for your reply ! The two Sweclockers testers, Jonas Thörnqvist and Emil Björklund, state the following in an explanatory video that they felt compelled to add to the summary section of their detailed, multi-page review (2:59 - 3:17 into the video) : «... the drivers report a clock frequency of 1050MHz, GPU-Z reports a clock frequency of 1050MHz (this could, per se, be due to the software's lack of support for the Turbo fuction), but the point is that, no matter how much one looks at the card, it always runs at 1050MHz ...»

In any event, thanks for an excellent review !...

Henri

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,356
Points 48,595
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Sun, Jun 24 2012 8:20 PM

So, they're wrong in their assessment. GPU-Z detects the card properly, but doesn't poll clocks correctly yet. The Boost frequency definitely fluctuates. I saw it in action with my own eyes. The tool AMD was using to demo Boost, however, wasn't public. I was the functionality may be incorporated into a future release of the Catalyst Control Center.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 5
Points 40
Joined: Nov 2012
TR1PW1R3 replied on Sat, Nov 17 2012 10:58 PM

Don't worry, the 12.11 catalyst drivers will resolve alot of issues these cards have been having and will also increase performance by 5%-20%. Once these drivers are released the ATi cards will be faster than their Nvidia competitors along the same model comparison.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS