Time Warner Cable Files Request For Declaratory Judgment

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,111
Points 1,184,130
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, Apr 8 2011 1:57 PM

Not long after Time Warner Cable announced an app for the iPad that would enable consumers to play back live TV as well as play DVR'd television, the cable provider felt pressure to cut certain networks from its lineup. It did so in April, and has been working to add new channels ever since. Although the new offerings are certainly a step in the right direction, many users (as well as Time Warner Cable itself) want some of the old channels back.

Now, Time Warner Cable is hoping the courts will help the company get what it wants. Time Warner Cable is seeking a declaratory judgment that will allow the company to deliver the programming from Viacom cable networks for viewing on devices of its video customers’ choosing, including iPads.

Although Time Warner Cable says this is not a hostile lawsuit and appears to want to keep things civil, we still expect plenty of strong arguments to come from various network owners. Here's hoping Time Warner Cable gets the "dignified resolution" it is seeking.

We Filed A Request For Declaratory Judgment With Viacom This Afternoon

Last week, we pulled a number of channels from our iPad app. The Internet – not exactly a haven for measured discourse or patience for complex ideas – lit up with verbiage more commonly found in war movies and interviews with professional wrestlers.

Ultimately, we are very confident in our rights to distribute our programmers’ feeds over our cable distribution infrastructure to any digital device within our customer’s home. And some of our programming partners have taken the position that our interpretation is wrong.

We are confident enough in our interpretation of our rights that we are willing to take the matter to court. We’ve issued a release to that effect today – please see below:

Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) today announced that it has filed a request for declaratory judgment relating to Viacom cable networks. The request asks the court to rule that Time Warner Cable’s rights under its carriage agreement allows it to deliver the programming of this company over its cable systems for viewing on devices of its video customers’ choosing, including iPads, in their homes. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Cable said, “We have steadfastly maintained that we have the rights to allow our customers to view this programming in their homes, over our cable systems, without artificial limits on the screens they can use to do so, and we are asking the court to confirm our view. With over 360,000 downloads of our TWCableTV™ app, it is clear that our customers welcome the convenience and flexibility our new app provides.”

The app, which launched to customers on March 15, 2011, currently features 43 channels which are available to customers whose subscriptions include them. For a list of the channels currently available and updates on the app, please visit www.twcableuntangled.com, the company’s blog.

To be completely clear: this is not a hostile lawsuit. It’s a request for a declaratory judgment.

We’re at an impasse with a handful of network owners, and we need an impartial third party to referee the situation and confirm that our interpretation is correct. We thought the most efficient way to settle this would be to go before a judge and ask for a decision that, while noncombative, would establish the rights that we bargained for.

If we weren’t completely certain that we had the rights to distribute television to our customers’ iPads within their homes, we wouldn’t be asking for the court’s attention. Of course we want our customers to know about this, but we also want to make sure that everyone understands that this is not combat. Destruction and resolution are two very different things, something that gets overlooked a lot in public these days.

We’re moving towards an efficient and hopefully dignified resolution. And once we get there, we’ll let you know.

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,795
Points 40,670
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York

Hum, i don't see how they are wrong here, the feed is for customers that already bought the service, so how can they say they can't have it feed to what they want it on?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

Exactly Inspector. Time Warner should win in court and good for them for not rolling over to the networks and trying to get the most for their customers.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,830
Points 45,790
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Sat, Apr 9 2011 12:00 AM

I actually love this it is time for the revolt. The broadcasters are taking on the producers so we can have our media on our personally decided medium as long as it is on our property. I hate to say it but Time Warner is 100% right here as far as I see it, and totally. I hope it happens to music next, but wait this will enable that to really. Good work as far as I see it TW, Good work indeed!

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,830
Points 45,790
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Sat, Apr 9 2011 12:01 AM

It is my personal media on my property so I can do whatever I want to with it on any devices that I legally purchased I just love this.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS