AMD Radeon HD 6790 Graphics Card Review

rated by 0 users
This post has 14 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,818
Points 1,166,725
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Apr 4 2011 11:57 PM

AMD Radeon HD 6790 Graphics Card ReviewWhen AMD and NVIDIA release a new batch of next-generation graphics processors, gaps typically form in their respective product stacks as the entire top-to-bottom line-up of new products is fleshed out over time. When new GPUs are introduced, they usually offer increased performance at a given price point, which drives the cost of comparable previous-generation products downward. Occasionally the supply and demand of both the new and old products will result in a larger than desired price disparity between the new parts and the older ones that still remain on the market. It’s those large price disparities that are where product gaps show.

Such is the case with AMD’s current product stack. At the top of the line-up, AMD has the Radeon HD 6900 and 6800 series parts, but the lower-end of the market is still covered by Radeon HD 5000 series parts. Disregarding the few remaining Radeon HD 5800 series parts that will eventually sell out, the $100 to $120-ish Radeon HD 5770 is currently the first step down from the $150 to $180-ish Radeon HD 6850. AMD aims to fill that relatively large price gap between those two models with the new card we’ll be showing you here today, the Radeon HD 6790...

AMD Radeon HD 6790 Graphics Card Review

  • | Post Points: 185
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Tue, Apr 5 2011 12:46 AM

Nice review!

I have to say, it looks like a nice card for the mid-range crowd but the disappointing performance numbers kind of turn me away from this card.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 207
Points 1,515
Joined: Feb 2011

Eh, performance really isnt bad considering the price and its competion. The issue for me is these 3rd Tier cards (4830, 5830, 6790) always have odd thermals, odd price points, and dont really seem to have a place in the market except to fill a relatively small void. Plus the 6850 is only a few bucks more and performs noticeably better so honestly i dont see a need for this card...its sorta awkward....

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

I agree with both of you. Definitely not a card for a power user and it is awkward.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,820
Points 45,680
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Tue, Apr 5 2011 12:11 PM

Very true, but this card is not top rung in fact is is 3 or 4 down from the top rung in ATI's products so the perf is gonna be a bit off.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,820
Points 45,680
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Tue, Apr 5 2011 12:12 PM

There 850/870 are ATI's money makers I would think. So there performance compared is better than the comp. The 970 is more for BA right's!

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 324
Points 4,305
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Perth Amboy, New Jersey

I my opinion, I think its time that more games get added to the test( Crysis 2,Call Of Duty, Battlefield 2) and second , these are low budget cards...while its right that they get tested in 1920x1200 and 2650x1600, this review should have the results for resolutions of 1024x768, 1280x1024 and 1680x1050, which is what they were meant for.

i7-950@3.8 + Asus Sabertooth X58+ CM692 Advanced+ 6GB A-Data Gaming DDR3@1600

ATI Radeon 6870+ 1TB Hitachi HD+ 750w Modular PSU + Asetek Liquid Cooler + DigitalStorm PC  

YesThanks To HotHardware.ComYes

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,356
Points 48,595
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Tue, Apr 5 2011 12:36 PM

@Sammy - 1024 and 1280 and compeltely pointless to test with current-generation mid or high-end graphics cards. Everything will run at playable framerates and / or be CPU bound. AMD actually targeted 1920 with this card, so I tested that resolution and one more taxing to show how it holds up in more stressful circumstances. What's interesting to note is that the 6790 actually wins more tests at 2560 than the 550 Ti, which bodes well for it in the future. Had that res not been tested, we wound't know that. 1680 is a useful resolution, but we're talking 1.76MP (1680) vs. 2.07MP (1920). The performance different is not going to be nearly as dramatic as the delta from 1920 to 2560.

As for the games, I like to stick with a set group of games / apps for as long as possible so readers can go back to previous articles and get an idea for performance not only over time, but versus older cards that may not get re-tested once they're EOL.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,772
Points 40,510
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York

Every time u see Marco on steam hes testing out something new! :D

Nice review, its a decent card in its range.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,572
Points 103,130
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator

Inspector:
its a decent card in its range

agreed,...not everyone can spring for a top of the line card for their system and it's good to know what works well in the lower priced categories too. I install discreet graphics for people with built-in video systems all of the time. I do it to free up their system from the video robbing the RAM and to speed up graphic performance for them.

One card that I like is the 1GB-MSI N440GT for about $79.00. It gives a tremendous boost to a low end systems graphics capabilities, and it is a Fermi card that's 3D capable, and has CUDA, and PhysX too. The card comes with regular and also low profile configurations for slim cases. (Dell boxes)

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,016
Points 10,925
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Mcallen, Texas
OSunday replied on Tue, Apr 5 2011 9:56 PM

Is this meant to be a replacement to AMD's Radeon 5770 from the 5000 series?

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 28
Points 160
Joined: Mar 2011
wannab replied on Wed, Apr 6 2011 4:01 PM

Not a bad card, it could possibly be useful to many users out there trying to update their computer without spending a bundle doing so.

Great review btw!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 467
Points 3,710
Joined: Feb 2011

I agree for a few more bucks you can step up in performance considerably. I look for the best bang for the buck when making my decision.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,372
Points 80,290
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: United States, Arizona
Moderator

rather bland card over all... but its mid range so you cant expect much from it.

"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."

2700K

Z77 GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER

GIGABYTE GTX670

G.Skill Ripjaws X 16gb PC2133

Antec P280

Corsair H100

Asus Blu-ray burner

Seasonic X650 PSU

Patriot Pyro 128gb SSD

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,372
Points 30,960
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Crystal Lake,IL
rrplay replied on Sat, Apr 16 2011 1:29 PM


Marco C:


 What's interesting to note is that the 6790 actually wins more tests at 2560 than the 550 Ti, which bodes well for it in the future. Had that res not been tested, we wouldn't know that. 1680 is a useful resolution, but we're talking 1.76MP (1680) vs. 2.07MP (1920). The performance different is not going to be nearly as dramatic as the delta from 1920 to 2560.

As for the games, I like to stick with a set group of games / apps for as long as possible so readers can go back to previous articles and get an idea for performance not only over time, but versus older cards that may not get re-tested once they're EOL.



 what is most interesting to me is the way the cards are consistently evaluated around here by Marco using a 'suite' of tests to evaluate where the card performance sits. Without that it would be pretty hard to see exactly where the card performance is and do the comparison.

Even though I have a HD 5770 it would be interesting to checkout similar benches and tests to learn along the way and have a much better appreciation for the efforts in the reviews.

Too bad my screen resolution is inappropriate as mentioned but all the same going to work with I currently have

because it would be fun.Smile

Thanks Marco

"Don't Panic ! 'cause HH got's your back!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (15 items) | RSS