New 3DMark 11 Video Tantalizes With DX11 Splendor

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,846
Points 1,114,875
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sun, Oct 24 2010 10:12 PM
Futuremark hasn't told anyone when it plans to launch 3DMark 11, but the video and screenshots the company has released thus far point towards a gorgeous application. It's arguably timely; the three-year-old 3DMark Vantage doesn't support DirectX 11. This could probably be fixed via an update, the same way 3DMark 2005 was rebuilt as 3DMark 2006, but Futuremark apparently has enough changes in mind to justify a new program.

These tidings are virtually guaranteed to kick off a fresh round of debate over whether or not 3DMark is a "real" test, or whether it deserves to be considered a benchmark at all. In addition to providing news of the actual video, we've decided to tackle this question. It's an ironic argument—Futuremark was actually founded by several former members of Future Crew. Our fellow dinosaurs might recognize that name—from 1992 - 1994, Future Crew earned recognition as one of the best demo-building* organizations around. Demos from this time period could be considered the ancestors of modern benchmarks. These programs were often coded in Assembler and could be highly tuned for the processors they ran on. In the days before 3D video cards, a well-designed demo could serve as a valid test of a CPU's performance when executing different types of code.




In the two shots above, Tessellation is on the in the first, off in the second. To see the difference, compare the ridges of carving on the totem--they stand out more noticeably on the first.



Fast forward to the modern era, and the argument chiefly focuses on whether or not a benchmark that isn't based on a shipping game can be a real or useful test. Our answer to this question is yes, though it helps to understand exactly what's being tested. On the simplest level, performance in 3DMark does correlate to performance in Because it's a well-known test that both AMD and NVIDIA examine with a fine-toothed comb, it's a bellwhether of what we should expect from other games. When games drastically deviate from 3DMark's relative performance ranking (either positively or negatively), the application provides an additional point of comparison.



This doesn't make 3DMark the single-most important 3D test, but it does offer a relatively unchanged series of ranking that can be referred to year after year. Because it's designed to run as independently from the CPU as possible, it's potentially a better performance indicator than another game that puts a heavier load on the CPU.

*The term "demo" means something slightly different in this context. Demos aren't restricted (but free) examples of programs or games—they're projects that a group of coders have built to demonstrate their programming skills. Future Crew became famous for Unreal (1992) and Second Reality (1993). An early 3D benchmark, Final Reality, was designed by members of Future Crew who formed Remedy Entertainment. 
  • | Post Points: 50
Not Ranked
Posts 7
Points 65
Joined: Oct 2010

Thank god, it was about time, you can't properly bench DX11 with DX10 software.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 140
Points 1,710
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto

I wonder if they are going to allow the Extreme preset now to be used on 1920x1080.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,048
Points 60,675
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Tue, Oct 26 2010 4:03 PM

I think the real diff in the top two pictures can be seen by looking at the bottom of the curving hook things jutting from the columns.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Tue, Oct 26 2010 8:53 PM

3vi1:

I think the real diff in the top two pictures can be seen by looking at the bottom of the curving hook things jutting from the columns.

I agree as well. It looks a lot more smoother and well, more realistic I guess.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS