Six Silicon Valley Tech Firms Forced To Halt Anti-Competitive Hiring Blocks

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,334
Points 1,191,010
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sun, Sep 26 2010 5:30 PM
Wow, this is odd. According to a new report today from the United States Department of Justice, six very well recognized silicon valley companies are have their hands slapped by a very powerful entity. The DoJ has mandated that six companies stop entering into anti-competitive employee solicitation agreements, which they have apparently been doing for as many as 5 years.


It sounds like the six companies have agreed to comply, as the DoJ filed a lawsuit but says that the accompanying agreement should cover that. You're probably dying to know who exactly has been named here, so here goes: Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar. We're pretty sure you have heard of all six if you're here reading this site. According to investigations by the DoJ, these six companies were mixed up in agreements that forbid one company from calling another company's employee(s) in order to run any job offers by them. For example, Apple could not call Google employees and see if they'd like a different/better job at Apple, and vice-versa.


Obviously, the DoJ doesn't look kindly on those kinds of arrangements, and they said that the agreements eliminated a significant form of competition to attract highly skilled employees, and overall diminished competition to the detriment of affected employees who were likely deprived of competitively important information and access to better job opportunities. The agreements between Apple and Google, Apple and Adobe, Apple and Pixar and Google and Intel were said to have "prevented the companies from directly soliciting each other’s employees."

Anyway, it sounds like all six companies have agreed to halt these type of arrangements, but we have to wonder if any punishment will be issued. And who knows what this will do to the potential job market in Silicon Valley.

The department said in its complaint:

  • Beginning no later than 2006, Apple and Google executives agreed not to cold call each other’s employees.   Apple placed Google on its internal “Do Not Call List,” which instructed employees not to directly solicit employees from the listed companies.   Similarly, Google listed Apple among the companies that had special agreements with Google and were part of the “Do Not Cold Call” list;
  • Beginning no later than May 2005, senior Apple and Adobe executives agreed not to cold call each other’s employees.   Apple placed Adobe on its internal “Do Not Call List” and similarly, Adobe included Apple in its internal list of “Companies that are off limits”;
  • Beginning no later than April 2007, Apple and Pixar executives agreed not to cold call each other’s employees.   Apple placed Pixar on its internal “Do Not Call List” and senior executives at Pixar instructed human resources personnel to adhere to the agreement and maintain a paper trail;
  • Beginning no later than September 2007, Google and Intel executives agreed not to cold call each other’s employees.   In its hiring policies and protocol manual, Google listed Intel among the companies that have special agreements with Google and are part of the “Do Not Cold Call” list.   Similarly, Intel instructed its human resources staff about the existence of the agreement; and
  • In June 2007, Google and Intuit executives agreed that Google would not cold call any Intuit employee.   In its hiring policies and protocol manual, Google also listed Intuit among the companies that have special agreements with Google and are part of the “Do Not Cold Call” list.

 

The proposed settlement, which if accepted by the court will be in effect for five years, prohibits the companies from engaging in anticompetitive no solicitation agreements.   Although the complaint alleges only that the companies agreed to ban cold calling, the proposed settlement more broadly prohibits the companies from entering, maintaining or enforcing any agreement that in any way prevents any person from soliciting, cold calling, recruiting, or otherwise competing for employees.   The companies will also implement compliance measures tailored to these practices.

Today’s complaint arose out of a larger investigation by the Antitrust Division into employment practices by high tech firms.   The division continues to investigate other similar no solicitation agreements.

Adobe Systems Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in San Jose, Calif., and 2009 revenues of nearly $3 billion.   Apple Inc. is a California corporation with its principal place of business in Cupertino, Calif., and 2009 revenues of more than $42 billion. Google Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Mountain View, Calif., and 2009 revenues of more than $23 billion. Intel Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Santa Clara, Calif., and 2009 revenues of more than $35 billion.   Intuit Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Mountain View, Calif., and 2009 revenues more than $3 billion.   Pixar is a California corporation with its principal place of business in Emeryville, Calif.

The proposed settlement, along with the department’s competitive impact statement, will be published in The Federal Register, as required by the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act.   Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed settlement within 60 days of its publication to James J. Tierney, Chief, Networks & Technology Enforcement Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street N.W., Suite 7100, Washington D.C. 20530.   At the conclusion of the 60-day comment period, the court may enter the final judgment upon a finding that it serves the public interest.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,682
Points 104,315
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Sep 27 2010 7:58 AM

They also sue one another when talent (talent that they don't even want) goes to a competing company.

HP suing the CEO they fired a few weeks ago to prevent him working elsewhere is a prime example of this.

They all want their cake and to eat the employees too.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

This is just a great way to get rid of employees when you want to. Just have the othe rcompany make a solicitaion and say Hey I found your resume in the printer:P

I just find it Sad that The D's in congress are now trying to act as the champions to bring outsources jobs back! Just a month away from the mid terms! Since the 90's are the times that all that was forced to happen, now they say Oh were here to fix it:P

I dont think this is really an issue. Since as an employee you can and should be shopping around all the time for a better opportunity. That is unless you have job security with a lifetime contract at Intel?:P

Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,682
Points 104,315
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Wed, Sep 29 2010 8:22 PM

animatortom:
I just find it Sad that The D's in congress,.......

Since when did this become political?

Now repeat after me,...."they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

Ooohm!,..........................

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

Sorry Neil, I should have made it more clear. Or maybe I just wanted to Irk all those silly Liberal crazy Bloggers! (know History,..Or you have No History)

The D's I was talking about was all the Douchbags!

Not an R or D thingCool

Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,682
Points 104,315
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Wed, Sep 29 2010 9:13 PM

animatortom:
Not an R or D thing

But STILL,......"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

"they're ALL BUMS and we should vote every one of them out",....

Ooohm!,..........................

.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

You should know by now that I totally agree with you!  If we didn't have so many people telling us what kind of toilet paper to use or how we must have Apples instead of fries! And many commissions to regulate and enforce it!

Then we would have an upgraded Shuttle program for the next twenty years! Instead we have to hitch rides with Russia because being a Commie is cool:P

We can send 7Billion to Pakistan every six months, or billions to Mexico and Venezuela but we cant keep a running space program? Instead they have to spend their days reaching out to muslin history?
 
What we should do is only pay them 30K for all gov employees and at most 50K for Prez! Then people who really will do the right thing will take the job, not the ones who just want money! Then they would actually be Public Servants!
 
See I can be radical as well! Another Idea is all this complaining about teachers and firemen, and how they are working to save their jobs!!? Well there is a simple solution! Don't pay them!!! :P
 
I never understood why teachers and firemen have to pay taxes! when their salaries come from taxes? If a teacher or Fireman make 60K a year yet only take home 35K? Then why not just pay them 45K without that tax! It works for priests:P Then they end up making more living better and wont need to be rapped by the unions. Boosting our economy in the process, and making happier and more secure public jobs in the process?
 
I used to like my union as well, until I realised that they only care about you when you are working for a big company and they are getting your Union dues. When you are not working they don't care! It is kinda like expecting the prostitute to show affection to you without actually paying her:P
Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS