Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: USB 3.0, SATA 6G

rated by 0 users
This post has 21 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,161
Points 1,185,445
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Thu, Jul 1 2010 12:58 PM

Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: USB 3.0, SATA 6GThe past few years have been very kind to Gigabyte; the company's shipments have increased to the point that it's now approximately tied with Asus in terms of volume shipments. Part of the reason for the company's good fortune is its decision to aggressively align its higher-end motherboards, both in terms of price and available features. Gigabyte has put a major push behind USB 3.0, and claims to have purchased one million of the three million USB 3.0 controllers NEC has shipped thus far.

The X58A-UD3R we're reviewing today is a good example of Gigabyte's competitive product positioning. The board's feature loadout is excellent given its ~$200 price point—the question we'll be looking to answer is whether or not the company cut any corners to hit its target...

Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: USB 3.0, SATA 6G

  • | Post Points: 155
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 119
Points 1,405
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
dlim783 replied on Thu, Jul 1 2010 2:07 PM

Looks Cheap. It cost 209.99 at newegg.com; however, it doesn't support 1600 Mhz Memory Module.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,830
Points 45,790
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Thu, Jul 1 2010 2:19 PM

I will say this I have owned or installed for close friends and family 4 Giga boards. I have found them to be no matter there cost solid motherboards. A Motherboard that is solid and updated regularly with good components is the most important thing in a system, and that is followed by the PSU as well as the environment (Case/Ventilation/airflow) it is in! My board in the system I am currently on is a Gigabyte X58A-UD5, on which i have not had a single issue since receiving it. The components, cooling, capacitors, ports etc on the board are solid high quality all the way around. I also like the fact Giga is a primary Intel research design and implementation partner as well as the way they are structured and run down to their employee relations (Which I have researched), they are a very solid company of whose components I am proud to own.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Jul 2010

I have got this. I have 1600Mhz module running in it. It works great. I originally had 2000Mhz modules in but 1 of the modules died and the shop I got it from had no replacement, so I decided to downgrade.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 102
Points 1,315
Joined: Jun 2010

Joel,

Kudos for doing a thorough comparative performance analysis of the Intel,  Marvell, and JMicron controllers.

One constructive criticism is that I very much liked your focus at the outset: "given its ~$200 price point—the question we'll be looking to answer is whether or not the company cut any corners to hit its target".  However, I think the review strayed from this perspective by benchmarking it against an EVGA classified and not a similarly priced ~$200 board.  And though you return to addressing the price-point comparison in the summary, it wasn't the focus of the review.

Regards, jturnbull65

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 119
Points 1,405
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
dlim783 replied on Thu, Jul 1 2010 10:04 PM

ASUS Rampage III x58 is an excellent motherboard.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

Id say what has been kind to Gigabyte has been their ability to provide reliable boards. Many people love them since they rarely have RMA issues.

The quality is there, and the price is always right.

Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 639
Points 7,630
Joined: Jul 2009

This is the equivalent (with upgraded port speed and the Nehalem CPU) of the Gigabyte board I have, the P55-UD3R. I've been quite satisfied with it after having problems with an Asus motherboard; it's been a while since I did the research on it, but I remember a good explanation of why you don't need memory that runs over 1333 MHz (1600 for overclockers). Perhaps someone can find that article.

I liked the heavier-weight copper substrate, since that's one of the things that leads to power stability and signal integrity. However, the "Smart 6" suite of utilities was more or less useless; it includes such things as parental time control and a backup that only backs up to the same HD as the source. I suppose the dual BIOS would be good in case of emergencies, but I've never had occasion to use it.

What I'd hope for, though, would be (a) more SATA 6G ports and (2) a way to differentiate them. It appears that most manufacturers that offer 6G give two ports to that interface; now, admittedly I'm wollgathering (all my drives are 3G) but I can easily imagine a build that uses three or more 6G devices. I hope that the future will bring more of the faster ports to these midrange boards.

 

@Joel (below):

Even so; however, in the days when SATA v1 (which I suppose we should call "SATA 1.5G") was new, two ports were thought to be enough. Now, people complain about needing more than the eight that seems to be the X58/P55 standard. I have no doubts that SSDs will continue to decrease in price, until even the people here who've been making excuses give in, and that the speed will continue to push and exceed the 3G interface speed.

So, all in all, while I wouldn't mind having the controllers (perhaps I forgot to state that I have nothing in the way of either 6G or USB 3.0 hardware... yet), I can imagine that two 6G ports will seem very limiting, and sooner rather than later. How (and how well) the board designers deal with it, well... that's up to the benchmarkers to tell us.


"I didn't cry when Bambi's mother was shot... but I cried when HAL was turned off."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,072
Points 11,625
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Fri, Jul 2 2010 10:09 AM

ClemSnide:

There are only two SATA 6G ports because the Marvell controller only supports two ports (see the page I wrote detailing the controller). You wouldn't *actually* want four ports off that one controller. Since it's hanging off a single PCIe x1 link, it only offers 400MB/s of bandwidth. That's plenty for two devices, although two high-end SSD's could still theoretically hit the limit.

Four hard drives could easily hit the wall at 100MB/s. Two ports is fine, given that:

1) The ICH10 is still a bit faster than the Marvell

2) Two high-end (and extremely expensive) SSDs will saturate a PCIe Gen 2 x1 link.

3) Four high-end HDDs (and quite expensive) HDDs will saturate a PCIe Gen 2 x1 link.

4) Since no HDD can actually sustain transfer rates high enough to benefit from SATA 6G, you're better off just plugging these into the Intel controller.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,072
Points 11,625
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Fri, Jul 2 2010 10:11 AM

Clemsnide:

Forgot one bit. Double the ports means double the controller chips, which increases board complexity and 'business' in that area by quite a lot. In order to create a RAID link between devices, the two chips would have to communicate by some sort of bridge (or else all RAID communication would have to be handled in software.)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 341
Points 4,490
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
slugbug replied on Sat, Jul 3 2010 5:07 PM

This board is an improvement over the first gen X58-UD3R which only had 4 memory slots.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 160
Points 2,380
Joined: Aug 2004
werty316 replied on Thu, Jul 8 2010 11:04 PM

Looks like a winner considering its a LGA1366 and they are usually not cheap so $200 bones is great.

There is no god, there is only Chuck Norris.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 140
Points 1,710
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto

The only cheaper 1366 board I can find is a BNIB DX58SO for $150 or less on average in ebay and trading forums because nobody seems to want to buy them even though it went through several revisions already. lol

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 160
Points 2,380
Joined: Aug 2004
werty316 replied on Sat, Jul 10 2010 1:41 AM

I would buy ECS over Intel made boards any day lol

There is no god, there is only Chuck Norris.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 140
Points 1,710
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto

Bad experience?

I like that they still support the really old motherboards on their site though.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,105
Points 38,225
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Mon, Jul 12 2010 5:48 PM

Intel makes good boards and good chipsets...

Dunno why you wouldn't buy one...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 160
Points 2,380
Joined: Aug 2004
werty316 replied on Tue, Jul 13 2010 10:53 PM

I don't mind boards based on an Intel chipset, its the boards that are made by Intel like these that I don't like because they seem to basic to me. I should have been more clear, sorry.

 

There is no god, there is only Chuck Norris.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 341
Points 4,490
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
slugbug replied on Thu, Jul 15 2010 1:58 PM

I find it very strange that Intel is taking so long to implement USB 3.0 on it's own line of motherboards. Unless they know something we don't.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 140
Points 1,710
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto

werty316:

I don't mind boards based on an Intel chipset, its the boards that are made by Intel like these that I don't like because they seem to basic to me. I should have been more clear, sorry.

I think its because of their approach to overclocking in general since they are the processor manufacturer compared to Asus or Gigabyte or EVGA boards which have enthusiast friendly features and marketed as promoting OC'ing.

slugbug:

I find it very strange that Intel is taking so long to implement USB 3.0 on it's own line of motherboards. Unless they know something we don't.

It might be because of Intel Lightpeak.  IMO They are trying to delay and  and hamper USB 3.0 so it doesn't get as big of an adoption and when light peak comes out it will overtake the spot USB is in as the universal transfer port.

 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,105
Points 38,225
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Thu, Jul 15 2010 6:43 PM

lol... yea Intel does make some pretty boring look MB. And they don't always have the same features as 3rd parties... but they do make a quality product. :-)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 341
Points 4,490
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
slugbug replied on Sat, Jul 17 2010 5:28 PM

Generally speaking Intel motherboards are not made for enthusiasts. Recent ones do have overclocking features in the bios though. Nowhere as good as Asus or Gigabyte though.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 140
Points 1,710
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
crowTrobot replied on Wed, Jul 21 2010 11:10 AM

Speaking of which, I wish Gigabyte would make an mATX motherboard to compete with the Rampage II/III Gene.   They don't even make any mATX 58!!  I'm going to buy a Rampge III Gene but its only because its the only good mATX x58 board (thankfully the reviews have started to come out now). I wish there was a UD3R equivalent in mATX form (lots of useful features and great price)

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (22 items) | RSS