It has been quite a while since AMD launched a new high-end desktop chipset. The 790FX has been riding high at the top of AMD's line-up for over two years now. It has been paired to newer Southbridge chips and AMD did follow up with the 790GX about a year and half ago, but for all intents and purposes AMD's flagship desktop chipset has remained unchanged for what is equivalent to an eternity in Internet-years.
Today, however, a new chipset will finally supplant the 790FX/GX at the top of AMD's line-up, the 890GX. As its name suggests, the 890GX features an integrated graphics core, but there's more to the story than just graphics. AMD has specifically stated that the 890GX will officially support upcoming 6-Core Phenom II X6 processors and courtesy of a new Southbridge, the SB850, the AMD 890GX is the first core logic chipset to natively support SATA 6G...
AMD 890GX SB850 Chipset Debut: Phenom II X6 Ready
Why Sata 3 (6Gbps), and no USB 3 which was released just before the SATA protocol was? Either way it looks like a good new board otherwise, just kind of strange.
I'll have to pass on this for now. It doesn't bring enough newness to the table to shake me off of this 'Intel Tree' I find myself holding onto. Maybe it will really rock with a Six core CPU on it, but it's not so impressive all by itself.
Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.
That's one thing that kind of confuses me a bit. Why release a 6 core processor, if you have an 8 core on tap at a smaller nm construction factor, which supposedly will be compatible with existing AM3 chip socket boards?
Seems to be the same strategy the 5000 series GPU is following, which is flood the market with every conceivable iteration of a device type period.
Im actually glad that the new SB850 doesnt have USB3. This let AMD keep costs down since USB3 is a whole another animal vs the sata 6gbps update. USB3 will be integrated in the next chipset iteration for buldozer in 2011, and there isnt much point in having it now when there are only a hand full of devices that use USB3. On the other hand, SATA 6gbps has lots of new SSD's on the market due to the fact that the SATA II interface bottlenecks current SSD's.
Seriously rapid1, learn to edit your posts instead of double posting to up your post count.
A+ Certified PC Repair Technician Associates Degree in Computer ScienceBachelors Degree in Computer Information Systems
DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250GB Dead.......Replacement Abit KV-85Learn more about Comp TIA A+ Certification.
I am waiting for this 6 core chip to upgrade from my intel Q6600.AMD rocks
"That's one thing that kind of confuses me a bit. Why release a 6 core processor, if you have an 8 core on tap at a smaller nm construction factor, which supposedly will be compatible with existing AM3 chip socket boards?"
Really? Can you give me a link? Because I heard the 8-core, 32nm chips (Bulldozer?) will use a different socket, will only support DDR3 (as opposed to AM3 which supports both DDR2 and DDR3), and at that point it would also make sense for it to be triple-channel too. If it won't be compatible with AM3, then 6-core makes perfect sense as an upgrade for some people before Bulldozer comes out in the middle of next year.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms