NVIDIA is launching a new mainstream graphics card today, aimed squarely at consumers in the market for a relatively low-cost upgrade from an integrated graphics solution or older entry-level GPU. The new GeForce GT 240, features a GPU outfitted with 96 processor cores, 8 ROP units, and 32 texture filtering units. In addition, the GT 240 GPU is manufactured using a 40nm process, it features a GDDR5 memory controller (that's also compatible with GDDR3), and unlike NVIDIA's current high-end GPUs, the GT 240 is DirectX 10.1 compatible.Although its specifications aren't terribly high-end in light of NVIDIA's more powerful GeForces, the GT 240 is actually more advanced than its counterparts in a number of respects. Click the link below and check it out...Zotac GeForce GT 240 AMP! Edition Review
Zotac's GeForce GT 240 AMP! Edition
I was really confused why you guys thought the card was so good, until I realized how much it will cost. Despite those numbers, I don't see why you wouldn't buy a 9800gtx or something around there. You'd get better performance, however that HD out is a nice feature. Regardless, this seems like a solid card for an HTPC.
mentaldisorder, even at $100, the performance is very mediocre. For this price you can get a ATI 4770, a GT 250.
An extra $30-40 will get you a GTX 260/4850 on sale.
I was hoping the GT 240 would be 8800GT/9800GT performance. Nope, it is weaker. Nvidia's own low-power 9800GT retails for less than this and is faster...
The whole GT 2xx line is utter slow performance, overpriced crap. ATi offers higher performing, and also in low power, alternatives for cheaper.
I agree with your first couple of statements. But I do think the GTX 260 and GTX 280 M are the best cards available in their price category.
I wouldn't say scrap the entire line...just anything lower than a GT 250.
That is what I meant - anything with a GT in it which is 240, 220, 210.
GTS 250 and GTX 260 are fast cards, if priced a tad bit higher than ATi counterparts. Nothing wrong with anything GTS 250 and above. But below is really embarrassingly low performance for the price paid.
I'm pretty sure that I said that you'd get more for your money by using a 9800GTX or similar card. They are around the $100 mark...
lately I'm conflicted. I've been buying Radeon Cards for about three years because of the price/performance factor. My last Radeon purchase was a 4870 1GB card that still performs quite well and was a heck of a lot less money than what you could buy a high end NVIDIA driven card for. NVIDIA always seemed to manage to market the very fastest card out there, but for a large price premium too.
My new core i7 system came with a EVGA 2GB GTX285 card in it that just friggin' rocks. So while my frugal side says that cheaper is better, and good enough, my gaming side is saying "Spend the extra money, dummy!"
This GeForce GT 240 is a non starter just because of the price point. Most of us know how to compare prices nowadays.
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms