Sharp Claims Blu-ray Breakthrough

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 7,266
Points 185,525
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Mon, Sep 14 2009 4:48 PM
Sharp has announced that it's now capable of building a blue-violet laser with an optical output of 500mW that's capable of writing triple and quadruple-layer Blu-ray (BD) discs at up to 8x. (36MB/s) In theory, this new development could be attractive to consumers/businesses who prefer to backup to optical disc, but find themselves hampered by the 25GB (single-layer)/50GB (dual-layer) capacity of current BD-R drives.

Breakthroughs in optical storage density/speed can be interesting in and of themselves, but Sharp's announcement would be a lot more exciting if BD-R drives and media weren't so expensive. This is less an issue for BD recorders—a 5.25" Blu-ray drive is about $105 at NewEgg, compared to $179 for a burner. That's a relatively modest 70 percent premium for the drive, but the media cost disparity is far worse. 25GB, single-layer, write-once discs are currently about $5 each; 50GB discs are currently $19 per disc. Re-writable Blu-ray discs are $9 for 25GB media. A pack of Memorex CD-R disks is $9.29 or 18.5 cents per disc. CD-RW's are all of 55 cents each. The DVD comparisons, meanwhile, aren't much better.

The media cost disparity is one of the main reasons research firm iSuppli expects Blu-ray PC adoption will be weak; the firm projects just 16.3 percent uptake by 2013. Even if Blu-ray becomes the dominant viewing standard, it faces stiff competition in the PC market. Small hard drives, flash drives, and DVD burners each have their separate weaknesses and strengths, but collectively they fill a need BD-R can't because of its high cost-of-use. That could change in the long run, but it doesn't appear that we'll be seeing a change anytime soon.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,663
Points 23,810
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

I was just looking at BD-R prices on newegg the other day and was horrified by the prices - especially on 50GB discs.  100GB with this new technology would be cool except I'm sure the discs will cost ungodly amounts of cash.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,061
Points 26,795
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
3vi1 replied on Mon, Sep 14 2009 9:32 PM

I agree with CC. The cost of the drives and media makes a bluray writer a poor choice for the needs of most people - who can get a faster solution with all the removable storage they need by buying an external drive or two.

People read the stupidest things.  Like this sig, for instance.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 39
Points 390
Joined: Sep 2009
Kyouya replied on Mon, Sep 14 2009 11:53 PM

I think another question people should ask is if it's compatible with the existing Blu-ray players that is out in the market which includes the PlayStation 3.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 463
Points 4,990
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
realneil replied on Tue, Sep 15 2009 10:09 AM

Yes, with BlueRay technology the gouge is on. It's a shame that Sony didn't lose this one like they did the VHS/BetaMax wars. I will not pay the SONY tax for a real long time, if ever.

Prices will have to PLUNGE first.

Intel DP55KG with Liquid Cooled Intel Core i7 870 CPU @ 3.75GHz 

8GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3 RAM

2GB GTX-285 Video

2 SATA-II 7200 RPM 1-TB HDD'S in RAID-0

LiteOn 22x DVD±R/±RW DL

LiteOn Blu-Ray Reader

ViewSonic 22" Wide Screen LCD Display

Xtreme Gear USB Keyboard

Xtreme Gear USB Mouse

CyberPower 800W Power Supply

CoolerMaster Storm Sniper Gaming Case

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS