AMD Split

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,169
Points 32,015
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Dev Posted: Tue, Oct 7 2008 9:17 AM

AMD will be spit into two companies. One to design processors and the other to manufacture them. The move is made primarily from the stiff competition we've seen from Intel lately to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the company. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/technology/07chip.html

 Apologies if this is already been posted. 

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,415
Points 80,370
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

Hmm

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,996
Points 28,730
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: United States, Michigan
kid007 replied on Tue, Oct 7 2008 7:13 PM

 looks into a good move in my opinion. the design group get all the glitches done and work more closely with the manufacturing in developing a state of the art product...

MacBook Pro 13.3" LED-Backlit Glossy, Intel "Penryn" Core 2 Duo T8700 - 2.53G, 4GB of Ram (would be upgrading soon to 8g's), NVIDIA GForce 9400M 1280X800

XPS 630i| Intel Q6600 @ 2.8GHZ- (1245 FSB) (1.30V)| 4GB DDR2-800| Microsoft Home Premium 64 Bits| 2x ATI Radeon 3870-CROSSFIRE!| SB Live! Extreme| Nvidia 650i SLI Motherboard| 3dMark Vantage P8953| 3dMark06 15049

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,595
Points 33,365
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
3vi1 replied on Tue, Oct 7 2008 10:58 PM

Someone, for the love of god, please correct me if I'm wrong.  But:

 

Everytime I hear of a move like this, I get the feeling that one side of the house feels that the other side is dead weight.  I mean, how is it possible to make more money as two companies than as one?  Isn't it more likely that this is to show to which side the losses are attributable?

As one company, you charge yourself less than others for the manufacturing process.  Unless this split magically makes other companies think "Oh, let's go to AMD's fab because they have no vested interest in design", I don't see how it helps.

This is something Microsoft knows, which is why - even though the DoJ ordered them split - they never did.  Smart.

"The solution is patenting as much as we can. A future startup with no patents of its own will be forced to pay whatever price the giants choose to impose. That price might be high. Established companies have an interest in excluding future competitors."-- Bill Gates, 2002-08-15

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,415
Points 80,370
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

You could be very right. I wonder if they are kicking the fabs so the engineers can keep making CPUs even if the fabs go under.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS