Dell Ultrasharp 2408WFP 24" Widescreen LCD

rated by 0 users
This post has 14 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,085
Points 1,183,205
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Jun 4 2008 12:02 PM

Dell’s lineup of flat panel displays have proven themselves to be reliable, stylish, and typically right on par price-wise with some of the most inexpensive LCD monitors on the market. They’ve delivered exceptional bang for the buck, and throughout the years, they’ve managed to improve the quality of the screens and the overall feature sets while overall prices have gone down. While this is also true for the rest of the monitor industry, Dell has retained their reputation for reliability, which still sticks with them today. Sure, Dell displays don’t have the raw sexiness of Apple’s Cinema series displays, but they’re typically quite a bit cheaper while offering more functionality.

Perhaps the best part of Dell’s monitor division is that they never slow down. Around every year or so, we typically see Dell launch refreshes of their monitor designs, which typically include updated bezel styling, upgraded features, and new connectivity options. This year is no exception, and Dell is getting pretty feisty with its new WFP lineup. Today, we’ll be looking at the 24” model, which many (including us) consider to be the sweet spot in terms of price, productivity, and raw size. Studies have often shown 24” displays to be the best for price/productivity, even more so than 30” displays, as many find screens larger than 24” hard to navigate due to having so much space.

Without further ado, let’s meet the latest display in Dell’s arsenal,
the 24” Ultrasharp 2408WFP.



  • | Post Points: 65
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,792
Points 28,435
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: South Carolina

That is one beautiful moniter! I,ve recently seen a Dell 24" at a local Staples not this paticular one but what I say was good example of their quality! Though a bit pricey at the moment I would be willing to wait it out to get one! Good review!

 

 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

"No matter what your opinion of Dell as a company is, it is difficult to find many people in IT circles who dislike their monitor division."

Mhmm, very true.  My brother has said negative things about Dell before, but he always sings praises on their displays, even going so far as to encourage me to buy one on multiple occasions.  They really are top-tier in the display market.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 20
Joined: Jun 2008
wagoo replied on Fri, Jun 6 2008 9:29 AM

News:

As for comparing the new 2408WFP against the budget-minded E248WFP, well, the difference is quite large. The E248WFP lags in terms of color support, contrast, input connectors, and has no USB ports or integrated card readers. However, the E248WFP has the same base screen as the 2407WFP, but at a much lower price-tag, so we’re certainly seeing progress here..

 

 

Are you sure about this? The 160deg viewing angle of the budget E248WFP is usually a tell-tale sign that unlike the other two monitors, it's infected with terrible TN panel AIDS.


  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 636
Points 9,140
Joined: May 2008
Location: Worcester, MA
SqUiD267 replied on Fri, Jun 6 2008 11:00 AM

  Too plain IMO. I like more colors on the frame Big Smile But looks like a quality product, I hope.

AMD Athlon X2 5000+ (Thanks to HH)

DFI Lanparty DK 790 FX

EVGA 8800 GT 512 mb

2 GB of G.Skill RAM

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 965
Points 13,300
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Other, Other
Nerts replied on Fri, Jun 6 2008 4:36 PM

 Did you get a chance to hook it up to a ps3 or a 360, if so how did it scale? With the HDMI it would be a good second screen for that but i've heard about some problems with other 24" displays when it comes to that.

 

Thanks, 

DFI LanParty UT nF4 SLI-D
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSI geforce 6800GS
250gig seagate
512x2 OCZ Performance
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

That actually sounds like a good thing to add to monitor reviews.  LCD monitors are 16:10 and the 360 and PS3 can't do that, so does it stretch 1920x1080 to fit into 1920x1200, or does it keep aspect ratio and letterbox it with black bars?  That would be good to know, if possible from you guys.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 463
Points 7,025
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: United States
AjayD replied on Sat, Jun 7 2008 8:39 PM

I recently purchased one of these, so as not to disgrace my new rig (thanks again HH) with my old 17" VGA monitor. I have to say I have been quite pleased with it. Although, I would strongly disagree with your opinion that it comes properly calibrated right out of the box. It is far too bright and the gamma levels are off. I however, didn't experience any of the red hue issues that other people have complained about and had no dead or stuck pixels.

I only have two complaints. The first being that the left hand side is noticeably brighter than the rest of the screen, which is made quite apparent when displaying darker colors, and the second being that I  briefly experienced a high pitch buzzing sound from the monitor. The sound only occured on one occasion and has yet to resurface, so I am hoping that it will not be a future issue. 

In regards to the contrast ratio, I think it is worth noting that the true ratio is 1000:1 and the 3000:1 ratio is dynamic. I am not a fan of dynamic contrast at all so I don't really see this as an added selling point. Dynamic contrast isn't too bad when the image being displayed is primarily dark, but when the image contains bright portions, the overall quality of the image is destroyed. For those who may not fully understand what dynamic contrast is and how it relates to true or static contrast I will explain the differences. Static contrast ratio is the ratio for the luminosity of  the darkest and brightest colors a display is capable of displaying simultaneously. Where as dynamic contrast ratio applies to the luminosity of the darkest and brightest colors a display is capable of displaying independently. Dynamic contrast works by dimming or under-powering the backlight of a display for dark images. Thus if an image contains bright portions, they will also be dimmed proportionately to those which are dark. 

While better LCD monitors certainly exist, they will not be found priced anywhere near the 2408WFP. Unless you don't mind spending 2g or more on a monitor, this one is sure to satisfy even the most discriminating tastes.

 

***** Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. *****

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,654
Points 29,000
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Texas
Drago replied on Sun, Jun 8 2008 8:10 AM

 The whole backlighting where part of the screen is darker than another, the color shifts when not looking directly at the center of the screen, the blurryness in games are all reasons why i have just stuck with my CRT.  I just cant make myself spend money on a screen that is inferior in quality to my CRT, expecially when it costs nearly 300 bucks for a decent LCD.

A+ Certified PC Repair Technician
Associates Degree in Computer Science
Bachelors Degree in Computer Information Systems

DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250GB Dead.......Replacement  Abit KV-85
Learn more about Comp TIA A+ Certification.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Same, Drago.  My 21-inch CRT, while heavy as sin, is only moved twice a year, so weight is almost irrelevant.  I can game at or above 1920x1080, while I desktop at 1280x960.  And if a game is too intense for a high resolution, I can do any resolution at all and it is the "native res".  Colors are fine.  A true high quality LCD will win in colors, but who is to say it won't come with problems (and of course will be stuck on a native res).

Hello

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,654
Points 29,000
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Texas
Drago replied on Mon, Jun 9 2008 11:21 AM

 LCD's cannot compare to CRT's in color.  Only the super high end S-IPS panels can get close, but a cheapo CRT will beat the socks off of ANY LCD in color reproduction.

A+ Certified PC Repair Technician
Associates Degree in Computer Science
Bachelors Degree in Computer Information Systems

DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250GB Dead.......Replacement  Abit KV-85
Learn more about Comp TIA A+ Certification.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Sharpness, contrast, I don't know exactly what I mean.  But using VGA on my CRT and looking at the boldness of colors is not as good as on an Apple LCD, imo.  I don't know how to describe it, but it's better.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 235
Points 3,045
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: newark nj
higgamo replied on Mon, Jun 9 2008 10:24 PM

=O if i get some extra money might try this out

  • | Post Points: 20
replied on Sat, Jun 14 2008 12:13 PM

 I cant trust Dell Monitor reviews anymore. They send out their best stuff to review sites and then when you actually order one often you get a different panel than what the review was based off of. Like this monitor for instance has been tested by some users to really high input lag and so there is some ghosting and bluring in games. Yet reviews dont mention this often at all because of course they got the best panels.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 4
Points 60
Joined: Jun 2008

I just bought my Wife a new Dell for her college graduation and I got her the 24 inch Ultrasharp and she absolutely loves it. I ihave a 22 inch HP with a glossy front but hers totally rocks!

 

Is your ISP watching you?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (15 items) | RSS