AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition CPU Review

12 thumbs up

3DMark06's built-in CPU test is a multi-threaded DirectX gaming metric that's useful for comparing relative performance between similarly equipped systems.  This test consists of two different 3D scenes that are processed with a software renderer that is dependent on the host CPU's performance.  Calculations that are normally reserved for your 3D accelerator are instead sent to the CPU for processing and rendering.  The frame-rate generated in each test is used to determine the final score.

Futuremark 3DMark06
Synthetic DirectX Gaming

3DMark06 had the Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition finishing ahead of the other AMD-made quad-cores and the Core i5-750, but it couldn't touch any of the six-core processors, especially Intel's much more expensive Core i7-970 nor could it match the performance of Sandy Bridge.

Futuremark 3DMark Vantage
Synthetic DirectX Gaming

3DMark Vantage tells the same story. The Phenom II X4 980 BE outpaces all of the other quad-cores we tested, with the exception of the Sandy Bridge-based Core i5-2500. All of the six-core processors were also faster than the X4 980 BE.

Article Index:

1 2 Next
0
+ -

Great Review, I was expecting the AMD processor to beat Intel in at least one test but I guess they are waiting until their next big release. Love to see competition between Intel and AMD which tends to equal improvements and better pricing for us consumers.

Intel gets the cake on this one though with the more powerful and energy conserving processor. The cake is double-layered and has strawberries.

0
+ -

Great review Marco, I had no idea they were releasing another phenom x4. That puppy sucks down the juice!!!! I feel like most people have their 955 or 965 oc'd past 3.7 already and are waiting for bulldozer at this point before they upgrade.

0
+ -

I'll be honest... i've given up on this line.... I dont care what cpu they come out with for this architecture, am going to wait to see whats next. Nothing against HH or Marco.... but this product, it feels almost redundant.

0
+ -

maybe its just the mood i'm in (I dont have a job, and the weather in Toronto the past couple of weeks has been sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Gloomy), but after reading this article, i was just like... Meh, whatever AMD.

0
+ -

So AMD put the most performance they can into this processor, just like what Intel did with it's 2006 Extreme Edition.

Not to say they're not bad processors but they're clearing out to make way for Bulldozer, which I'm very excited for.

0
+ -

Can't really get all that excited about this processor  but it may be an upgrade for some that are just buying a bit of time before a total system upgrade .Just think that a 965/970 would be a much better value with the OC. would still need a better heatsink ...anyways how much time would one want to buy ?

Thanks Marco for the review and with grey and chilly weather around here lately [most unusual for May]

I'll take a prolonged kat-snooooze with this one.

 

0
+ -

so... it gets it's ass kicked by an intel processor that is twice it's price? i'd rather get most of a new system at the same price that the i7 970 cost instead of paying double of what it should cost me to make a new rig...

0
+ -

I was actually referring to:

AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Deneb 3.4GHz  $140.00
AMD Phenom II X4 975 Black Edition Deneb 3.6GHz  $190.00

not the Intel's at all,

for an upgrade for those that already have AM3 sockets.

 

0
+ -

Worse. At NewEgg, the i7-970 is 3.65x more expensive than the Phenom II X4 970 but is only 20% faster at PCMarks, and 46% faster at "Communications" (whatever that is...).

0
+ -

I think I see one of these in going into my rig very soon

1 2 Next
Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: