
|
After Vista's delays, I would expect later rather than sooner. January 2010 would be too quick imo. It would be a Vista-like disaster all over again. |
|
Release date should be pushed back to at least 2012 I'd say later, Microsoft needs to take thier time and work all the bugs out. |
|
Look how bad vista is in my opion . I still use Xp. They should take their time with 7 and hopfully everything i mean everything from xp can transfer over and run with ease instead of making program have to be converted to work properly |
|
Microsoft is trying to get back to a 3 year release cycle on windows. Remember, SP2 features in XP were originaly going to be Vista only but security plagues forced a rollback of features to xp. Thus sp2 was born which should have been the "next version" of windows. If microsoft keeps OS releases to 6 years the market will get to "comfortable" with the current version slowing development of everything. take a look at this article about the final sp of xp: http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/xpsp3.asp |