Windows 7 Gets Named: "Windows 7" - HotHardware
Windows 7 Gets Named: "Windows 7"

Windows 7 Gets Named: "Windows 7"

Since the codename for the next release of Windows was announced, many of us have wondered what the actual name would be. Well, it turns out that the codename for the next version of Windows, Windows 7, is going to be the actual name for the product. And in what is somewhat of a passing of the torch, the announcement was made not on the Windows 7 blog, but on the Windows Vista blog.

In a few weeks we are going to be talking about the details of this release at the PDC and at WinHEC. We will be sharing a pre-beta "developer only release" with attendees of both shows and giving them the first broad in-depth look at what we've been up to. I can't wait for them to see it. And, as you probably know, since we began development of the next version of the Windows client operating system we have been referring to it by a codename, "Windows 7." But now is a good time to announce that we've decided to officially call the next version of Windows, "Windows 7."
As Mike Nash, Corporate VP, Windows Product Managemet, said in the post, this is the first time he can recall a codename being used for a Windows release. So, why a number? Well, according to the post, this is the seventh Windows release, and they didn't want to use another "aspirational" name like Windows XP or Windows Vista (or they didn't want to try as hard to come up with one, your choice). So how did they come up with this as the seventh release? Well, if you assume they plug Windows 95 and Windows 98, and things like Windows 3.1 and Windows 3.11 into the same "version category," and they exclude server versions, you could come up with:
  1. Windows 3.1
  2. Windows 9x
  3. Windows NT
  4. Windows 2000
  5. Windows XP
  6. Windows Vista
  7. Windows 7
Or if you just use members of the NT family, you could come up with:
  1. Windows NT 3.1
  2. Windows NT 3.5
  3. Windows NT 4.0
  4. Windows 2000
  5. Windows XP
  6. Windows Vista
  7. Windows 7
Or you could just say, "who cares?" and leave it at that. BTW, there wasn't any additional info in the post besides the name; we'll just have to wait for PDC and WinHEC for more.
0
+ -

You guys have no sense of history. Microsoft has always counted and named their client side OSes separately from their server side counterparts. For the client-side versions of Windows:

1. Windows 1.0 (1985)

2. Windows 2.0 (includes 286/386 versions)

3. Windows 3.x

4. Windows 95 (includes 98 and ME)

5. Windows XP

6. Windows Vista

7. Windows 7

Yes, I still have a Windows 286 box in the basement somewhere.

0
+ -

Give that man a cigar! I believe Jeremy has come up with the correct reasoning for the version.

At least, it beats my theory all to pieces: "Windows Se7en: You'll say a certain word 74 times."

0
+ -

I thought Cloud was the codename...

0
+ -

SqUiD267:

I thought Cloud was the codename...

 no, that was windows cloud, it was suppose to be a program that worked with Windows 7

 

0
+ -

Jeremy:

You guys have no sense of history. Microsoft has always counted and named their client side OSes separately from their server side counterparts. For the client-side versions of Windows:

1. Windows 1.0 (1985)

2. Windows 2.0 (includes 286/386 versions)

3. Windows 3.x

4. Windows 95 (includes 98 and ME)

5. Windows XP

6. Windows Vista

7. Windows 7

Yes, I still have a Windows 286 box in the basement somewhere.

First off Awesome post! Welcome to HH forums. Thats a good run down of the versions. Second I'm glad that they are keeping it simple. Windows 7 looks good and improves on Vista which I like very much all ready. The menus are a bit weird in vista. That would be my biggest complant. 7 seems to be working on that.

 

0
+ -

Good, I was actually kinda hoping they'd stick with something simple this go 'round.

0
+ -

dant beat me to it :)

0
+ -

OO 3.1 and the good days of DOS.... how is miss thee

0
+ -

linux ftw!

0
+ -

Actually, now that I look into it a little more, this isn't actually Windows 7. The chronology I posted is correct, except for #7. "Windows 7" is actually Windows 6.5, or Vista 2.0 if you will. All the alpha builds have had 6.x build codes. Looks like Windows 7 will be to Vista what 98 was to 95. Oh well, 98 was my favorite Windows OS before XP hit the scene, hopefully 7 will be good as well.

0
+ -

Nice observation! And I agree: Win98SE was actually pretty good for it's day. Now, we might not remember it that way if it hadn't been followed by WinME... but still.

Win7 might very well be the equivalent of a 98. It's obvious from the Mojave experiment that Microsoft knows there's a stigma to the Vista name - they may have been partially influenced to not call this next version VistaSE to mitigate that.

0
+ -

I just had another thought. What if we're way off on this naming thing. Consider three points:

  1. It's an operating system.
  2. Operating systems are written by, and most used by, geeks.
  3. Geeks love Jeri Ryan.

I rest my case.

0
+ -

I really need some advice and oppinions from you guys.

I'm still on XP and was just about to buy Vista home premium, but am wondering if it would be a waste of $ with the next OS seemingly right around the corner. What would be my best move?

I was thinking OEM for $99. That way even if it only lasts me about a year it's no big loss.

0
+ -

 

Hi All

I would definitely go with the OEM version Recovering. So long as you're not going to swap out the Mobo or the Proc you'll be fine. I have the OEM version of Vista Ultimate, and have had no issues whatsoever. In addition, when Windows 7 is released we'll have to wait & see what surprises if any that operating system has in stored for us.

0
+ -

recoveringknowitall:

I really need some advice and oppinions from you guys.

I'm still on XP and was just about to buy Vista home premium, but am wondering if it would be a waste of $ with the next OS seemingly right around the corner. What would be my best move?

I was thinking OEM for $99. That way even if it only lasts me about a year it's no big loss.

If you have a freind that has a vista disk borrow it and install it to see if you like it. You can legally run it for a month without a product key.

 

0
+ -

Or, if you're feeling adventurous, download Ubuntu 8.10 and play with it for a while.

If it's not your thing (i.e. you play games that don't quite work yet in Wine) by the time Windows 7 comes out, jump ship and sell your story to Microsoft for a new series of commercials!  You can legally run it for a month plus forever without a product key.

0
+ -

3vi1:

Or, if you're feeling adventurous, download Ubuntu 8.10 and play with it for a while.

If it's not your thing (i.e. you play games that don't quite work yet in Wine) by the time Windows 7 comes out, jump ship and sell your story to Microsoft for a new series of commercials!  You can legally run it for a month plus forever without a product key.

Ubuntu and windows are in a race for my full time support. Ubuntu wins if my games ever run perfect under linux. Windows wins if I can ever get 3D support for linux in a VM.

 

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: