Total Materials Cost For $1,500 Google Glass? $79.78 - HotHardware
Total Materials Cost For $1,500 Google Glass? $79.78

Total Materials Cost For $1,500 Google Glass? $79.78

Google Glass costs $1,500 for the time being, but a teardown of the spectacles reveals that the total cost of the materials inside totals $79.78. That’s what you’d call a significant markup.

TechInsight’s Teardown.com did the dirty work, and they found that the most expensive part was the Texas Instruments OMAP4430 processor ($13.96). Glass also has 16GB of Toshiba EGW1 64G NAND memory ($4.68), 512MB of SK Hynix mobile DDR2 SDRAM ($8.18), a 5MP camera ($5.66), and a 570mAh battery ($1.14).

Google Glass teardown
Source: TechInsights

The full list is quite interesting, but as the teardown is brief and the prices approximated (a more in-depth teardown is forthcoming), there are some questions the list raises. For example, the display is listed at a cost of $3. That seems off; technically, the physical materials used in the display may only cost $3, but we can’t imagine that price reflects what it costs Google to get that specialized display made.

Google Glass teardown
Source: TechInsights

A Google spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal that the cost estimate was “absolutely wrong” and provided no further commentary, so for now we’ll have to take TechInsight’s findings with a grain of salt, but even if this breakdown is way off, it’s a long jump from $79.78 to $1,500.

It’s true that the company has sunk mountains of money into R&D and manufacturing for this pioneering project, so a markup--especially at this still-experimental phase--is certainly expected, but at some point in the near future Google may need to publicly justify that $1,500 price tag.
0
+ -

What was the total development cost for R&D/marketing as well? Is that being vectored into the price breakdown?

+2
+ -

No--as you can see form the chart, it's strictly a materials breakdown. Even so, there's room for questioning I think.

0
+ -

Probably not, it would cost a hell of a lot more if it was probably

+2
+ -

whatever it is, it wont merit 1420 dollars difference...

0
+ -

Possibly Cliff. I'd imagine Google chucked a helluva lot of money to develop the project though...

0
+ -

Are we calculating dev work and r&r... yeah....

0
+ -

Even if the parts cost $500, that's STILL a huge margin. It seems obvious though that consumer models are going to be far more cost-effective than this, and I guess it basically has to be in order for widespread adoption. There's definitely a significant early-adopters fee here.

-1
+ -

and the total material cost of a painting is? this means nothing..

+2
+ -

A painting is not a mass-produced product, and for that reason most people don't own one.

0
+ -

1420 difference, for a device with limited production since its in developemente and recent introduction.. with hundreds of workers, a lot of testing.. honestly i guess you get what you pay for

+1
+ -

china could build it for usd$20 ... with 8MP camera + 1GB DDR2 Ram..

0
+ -

figures

+1
+ -

Sorry but I know myself and most people with common sense will not spend 1500$ for this.

0
+ -

Be advised the requirements to understand the technology will cost an individual more than 6,000 to learn the basics, but then again most people with a high school degree are able to figure that out eventually. The device is fine, its the applications I am interested in :)

0
+ -

They said flat out, once mass produced the price will drop...

0
+ -

research, development, marketing

0
+ -

If lots of people want it, then they're going to charge more for it.

0
+ -

Plus think of the time and MONEY spent to develop the software and design the glasses themselves? It's not cheap.

0
+ -

we always knew the explorer edition was way over priced didn't we? It was always said Explorer would be $1500 but the final product to consumers would be $300-600. It makes sense, I would say with R&D each glass costs them $160, and they will be selling for $300. Early adopters always get shafted anyway at least in terms of pricing.

0
+ -

Ok, buy the material and do yourself ;)

0
+ -

ouch! that is one heck of a price jump but maybe their is something else in them but im not sure but OUCH PRICE JUMP!!!!

0
+ -

Sounds like I should wait until these are readily available and priced around $99 before I should buy into the technology.

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: