
|
Well now that's a step in the right direction! |
|
Nice to hear, especially since I'm already satisfied with their solutions more or less. |
|
I'm a skeptic about it to tell ya the truth...after a decade of watch there product fail at its most basic functions, i will have to see for my self how it works...from a customers pc...not 1 of mine |
|
I love 360 on my PC |
|
i've tried the v2009 already, and i saw nothing improved, especially on boot-times, they are horrid. |
|
When I read pplz negative comments about Symantec software I always wonder why I've never had any problems with it... and believe me when I tell you: I'm very critical and pick things apart like crazy and also very sensitive to noticing performance issues, functionality and all the little details. Go figure. I suppose it could be that I'm not a very dynamic user compared to some others. BTW: To my knowledge, I've only ever gotten 2 viruses over 7 PCs in about 15 years... honestly! 1 of which I got due to surfing the net on a fresh install prior to installing any protection. BTW2: Now that I think about it I guess my boot time is kinda sucky. :( XP-breakdown from powering on: 12 sec. till bios splash screen, 25 sec. till loading bar(7-8 passes... meh), 50 sec. till welcome screen(no password), 72 sec. till desktop(fully ready to use). Shutdown takes only 10 sec. though from the time I press the button. |
|
It's not that I'm trying to just be critical of Symantic. I think if they are working on improving speed that's great. I sure it will bite me one day, but I just don't like running virus software. The only thing that starts up when windows starts up is steam and daemon tools. |
|
I'd rather be safe than sorry since I'm very into finding new sites... ones that I find on my own with having anyone recommend them or verify that they are safe. That type of surfing sorta requires a good AV IMO. |