
The decisions to retire older EA games are never easy. The development teams and operational staff pour their hearts into these games almost as much as the customers playing them and it is hard to see one retired. But as games get replaced with newer titles, the number of players still enjoying the older games dwindles below a point -- fewer than 1% of all peak online players across all EA titles -- where it’s feasible to continue the behind-the-scenes work involved with keeping these games up and running. We would rather our hard-working engineering and IT staff focus on keeping a positive experience for the other 99% of customers playing our more popular games. We hope you have gotten many hours of enjoyment out of the games and we appreciate your ongoing patronage.Titles affected include:

|
Via:
DigitalTrends | News Archive
|
|
EA confuses me more and more each day. Are they trying to make people hate them? I mean i understand why they are doing it, but its not like they cant afford to keep them open. |
|
@Joel They've been doing this for quite a while now, so I'm not surprised by their reasoning to do this. It's sad to see these game servers go offline (let's see them keep up GoldenEye: Rogue Agent's servers up if they have the money.) but hey, more to the games of the future right? |
|
This is why I love dedicated servers. If you have fans still out there then someone will have a server running. Hell you think EA, or any of the console guys would still have Counterstrike servers running? |
|
Hasn't CS gone down the shitter ever since Valve decided to turn a blind eye on the server list hacking? I agree with the rest though. Don't buy games that don't have dedicated servers. |