


|
Via:
Corsair | News Archive
| Tags:
Seagate,
SSD,
Corsair,
Momentus XT,
SSD Accelerator,
Nvelo,
OCZ Synapse
|
|
Actually, a minor correction for the article. The NVELO cache software for Crucial is actually a "Write-Back cache, and accelerates both Reads and Writes, the Write-Around cache described on the NVELO website is for Ultrabooks, where they use much smaller capacity drives (16-32GB) that don't provide a decent benefit for Writes. So, the Write-Back cache with the Crucial devices is more than twice as fast as the write-around cache for Ultrabook. And, both of these options are much faster than the latest Hybrid-HDD's, and much more efficient than boot drives... |
|
Mailman, That's unclear. I couldn't find any specific information on which strategy Corsair was using, and the CrystalDiskMark results posted on their own blog are rather odd: http://www.corsair.com/blog/accelerator-ssd-caching-drive-performance/ Sequential and 512K writes take a nasty hit. I didn't go to the trouble of posting the VelociRaptor's performance figures here, but it's worth noting that the Accelerator+Caviar Green is only about 1/3 as fast as the 600GB WD's write performance in those two tests. I'm not claiming that this makes the Accelerator Cache concept a bad one; it's entirely possible that CDM doesn't understand the caching structure properly. Check reviews of the already-released OCZ Synapse, however, and you'll see that there are certain kinds of write situations that a drive cache can't do much to accelerate. As I already noted, writes are a small part of the average user's desktop work, so that's really *not* much of an issue. It's just something to be aware of. |
|
Joel - Yeah, something is wrong with the data on the Corsair site... The following info makes sense PCMark (overall) improves by 300% (The HDD suite would be closer to 10x) Boot time improves by 500% Crystal Disk Mark: 4K Random Writes go from 1MB/s HDD to 47MB/s On Atto, all size Read/Writes improve by ~300% Application load improves by 300% But something is wrong with the Crystal Disk numbers... not consistent with other data. Need to look into this. Thanks for the follow-up, hopefully we'll figure this out. |