|
Via: Archos (PDF) | News Archive
| Tags:
Android,
Google,
Operating System,
tablet,
archos,
slate,
Honeycomb,
Android 3.2,
Archos 70b
|
|
cool? but a fire has better specs... It might not be honeycomb, but still |
|
Given how heavily-customized the Fire is, the Archos is a great option for those who want stock Android (let alone Honeycomb). At the very least, it may prompt other tablet manufacturers to drop the price a bit on their tablets. Of course, we'll have to wait for benchmarks to get a real idea of whether this is competitive at $200 or an Fire wannabe.. |
|
I almost feel like were moving backwards i haven't seen a product with less than a gig of ram in 5 years, but the pricepoint is dropping. i just think they ar too close to the useless line to keep up with fire and the nook color. |
|
You do know the Kindle Fire also has 512MB of RAM, right? The Nook Tablet has 1GB. I still think there is a place in the market for the Archos. since it runs stock Honeycomb, versus a heavily-customized version of Android that eats up more system resources. I realize it may not reach the same level as the Kindle Fire in terms of sales, but most of the sales push towards the Fire is because it's an Amazon-branded tablet that can access Amazon content. If it didn't have the deep integration with Amazon, I don't think it would sell nearly as well based on specs alone. |
|
Calling 199 sub 200 while accurate, is also BS. Thats 200. 187 is sub 200. They may as well take that dollar. I liked their MP3 and media players back in the day, so I can see myself using this if the battery is good enough. Id use it purely for browsing and media, so past that I am not too worried. Doesnt mention internal storage. SD cards would suffice, I guess. |