Crysis 3: Amazing Graphics, Boring Execution - HotHardware

Crysis 3: Amazing Graphics, Boring Execution

4 thumbs up
Crysis 3 picks up 20 years after Crysis 2. Prophet has been in suspended animation for 20 years. You're woken up by Psycho (another returning character from Crysis 1), only he's lost his nanosuit. You've been rescued to stop the evil Cell corporation. New York has gone from virus-infected wasteland to primeval forest wasteland.


There are some beautiful sequences.

Prophet is obsessed with finding something no one else believes exists, but he's perfectly happy to walk through a few missions attacking Cell's New York facilities in the hopes that he'll find some information or something. The only reason to use a trope like "You wake up 20 years later" is because it gives you freedom to establish a compelling back story for a character. If Crysis 3's traipse through the New York Jungle had been interrupted by playable flashbacks of Prophet's search for the Alpha Ceph, imprisonment, and interrogation 20 years earlier, it would've been storytelling dynamite. Instead, we get a few blurred images and reverbed voice-over.


The engine is beautiful in every instance. These shots show the view from underwater, at night, and a burning building.

The game is also rather short. TimeToBeat lists a "Main Story" play through as taking 5 hours, 42 minutes. That's significantly shorter than Crysis 2's 8 hours, 47 minutes, which was still shorter than the original Crysis' 10 hour, 19 minute length. I ended up beating the game in a bit under 12 hours, but I also died frequently, lined up screenshots, and am generally a slow game player.

Dull Gameplay

Great games don't need gripping storylines. Serious Sam and Orcs Must Die are great examples of game franchises that eschew stories in favor of heart-pounding action. Here, Crysis 3 again misses the mark. Cevat Yerli's team treats the nanosuit armor Prophet wears in nearly fetishistic terms; it's the equivalent of being a Jedi Knight in the Crysis universe. Ensconced within the suit, Prophet runs faster, jumps farther, is encased in near-bulletproof armor and has a nearly perfect cloaking device. Clearly, you're meant to feel like an utter badass.


There are moments of badassery, to be sure. This thing looked pretty expensive.

The game's design and some poor pacing decisions completely undermine what should be its greatest selling point. There are three major problems:

Bad Weapon Design:  If you buy the Hunter Edition for $59.95 (and that's the standard copy that EA is selling on Origin), you get the Predator Bow at the beginning of the game. Pyscho hands it to you after the tutorial level is over. Problem is, the Predator Bow is easily the best all-around weapon in the game, particularly at higher difficulty levels. It allows you to fire while cloaked from the start, whereas you have to buy this power using suit upgrade points if you want to use it with other weapons.

It holds a maximum of 18 arrows -- three thermite-tipped, three lightning-tipped, three-explosive, and 9 carbon-reinforced penetrating shots. The carbon shots can be retrieved and all of the arrows are silent (no need to use a silencer, either). I love the bow -- but the way that it's just handed to you cheapens what ought to be a difficult unlock or substantial reward.

Of Perfect Eyesight and Glass Jaws: The next problem with Crysis 3's balance is the way you're virtually forced to sneak around and dispatch guards while cloaked in the early game. Most FPS games with a sneak component implement at least some sort of shadow system -- if you're back in the brush, or behind thick greenery, you can't be seen.

In Crysis 3, if you're behind a door / wall, you're invisible. If you're cloaked, you're invisible up to point-blank range. If you aren't one of those two things, you're visible to any enemy who so much as glances in your direction. Even if you're crouching, motionless, in grass so tall you can't see over it. Soldiers you can't see due to oceans of greenery can see you, perfectly. And at higher difficulty levels, your unarmored self has the life expectancy of a field mouse at harvest time.

The Checkpoint System: Crysis 3's checkpoint system is entirely event/location-based. In a straight-line run-and-gun, this isn't so much of a problem -- but Crysis 3 also hides "Intel" -- backstory briefings -- all over the damn place, along with ammo dumps, new weapons, and nanosuit upgrade kits. If you want to beat the game in style, you have to explore every nook and cranny. That can be a problem when you're also easy to kill and enemies like to attack from stealth. There were multiple points during the game when I'd killed all the enemies in the area, went exploring for goodies, took a wrong step, fell, and then had to replay the entire area again.


Grass:  Now with 200% more sexy

It's a game mechanic that actually discourages experimentation or new tactics. The need to kill from cover means a lot of careful sneaking and shot positioning, but it also means a fairly lengthy replay time. You don't need to die more than once or twice while trying out new melee moves, air stomps, or grabs to decide that no, this is a bad idea -- you don't want to replay the same chunk of game 6x in a row. Time to haul out the bow and snipe from a distance.

There are other flaws that degrade the game's experience. Key binding is glitchy -- I use EDSF instead of WASD, but the "F" key is hard-bound to dropping objects. I could pick them up all I wanted, but tapping "F" meant immediately dropping them. There's no way to run while using the Visor view to search for intel or ammo dumps, so you'll do all your map exploring at a walk. This is especially fun when combined with the infrequent, irregular check points.

Near the end of the game, there are a few flashes of brilliance. There are some driving sequences that recall the very best of Half Life 2's canal chases, only with considerably more firepower and a nanosuited Prophet that could bench press six Gordon Freemans on each arm. You roar through Cell territory on a rocket-packing dune buggy, blowing everything to smithereens while Cell and Ceph forces clash overhead. It's epic. It's what the game should've felt like throughout, but doesn't.

Article Index:

1 2 Next
0
+ -

Check that post a few days ago where Ubisoft wanted to know what PC gamers wanted to make their games better.

My comment on that post reflects exactly what this article says. They make STUNNING games, they're beautiful, you sometimes are completely in shock by the beauty of what their artist created. However, the game play is almost always lacking. Look at Farcry 2, completely beautiful, repetitive game play. Farcry 3, beautiful, better game play, however it's still lacking in the longtime game play. Crysis 2? I can't really comment, I bought it, played it for 10 minutes, uninstalled it, and never looked back. They just generally suck when it comes to game mechanics, if they could find someone who can create the actual game play as good as they can create a stunning world, then ubisoft would be one of the greatest game developers ever.

I still love Ubisoft, and i'm sure I'll eventually pick up Crysis 3, I just hate that they always let me down when it comes to game mechanics or replayability.

0
+ -

I was disappointed in Crysis 3. Not so much in the vague narrative, but in the sloppy execution. I think it really could've been a great game -- it *tries* to be a great game. I liked it quite a bit more than Far Cry 3, for example.

It could still be a worthy title if Crytek patches some bugs and fine-tunes a few other aspects. But at $60, it leaves me cold.

0
+ -

Seems like I'm one of the rare ones that -loved- this game. The biggest downsides for me was the sometimes poor AI, the useless map and the mediocre hacking. Aside from that, I loved the story, the action and of course, the graphics. And this is coming from someone who couldn't ever get into the previous Crysis games. This one actually intrigues me enough to go back and give them an honest go, though.

0
+ -

Wow I loved the game, Graphics are fantastic and I enjoyed the story line. Liked it more then Crysis 1 and 2. I did finish the game and I did like the way it ended. I;ll be playing it again on the next hardest mode.

I give FarCry 3 about 15 minutes before I turned it off, idk something about it i just need really enjoy. Same with Guildwars 2, i think GW2 was the lagish controls. Maxpayne about 2 hours.

BF3 still wins it for online, but it still seems good.

0
+ -

I'm glad other folks have liked it. I just can't claim to be one of them. :) 

0
+ -

They sent me a alpha key a few months back and like all crysis games it looked amazing but the game play still felt like it was lacking. I dont know what it is but i can never get into the multiplayer of crysis like other games such as css, tf2, or bf3. When the price comes down to $20 i will think about buying it.

0
+ -

I just got Crysis 3 and heard that the last patch just about made the MP unplayable?

0
+ -

I have to agree. I work retail and we sell Crysis 3. Not only did the game not get much attention, it got most people not interested in buying it because of the poor online experience.

And I agree with RiCoFrost, BF3 is still one of the main multiplayer games which dominates over some other Multiplayer games.

0
+ -

Sounds like todays rap music. Good beats but crap lyrics.

0
+ -

Aouch ! It hurt !

1 2 Next
Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: